University Jean Monnet Saint-Etienne, Mines Saint-Etienne, INSERM, SAINBIOSE U1059, Saint-Etienne, France.
Department of Rheumatology, Caen University Hospital University and INSERM, UniCaen, U1075, COMETE, PFRS, Normandie University, Caen, France.
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 10;14(9):e087872. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087872.
Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterised by inflammatory low back pain. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are recommended as a first treatment in axSpA. In case of inadequate response to NSAIDs, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) should be introduced according to the recommendations of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and the American College of Rheumatology. Until 2015, only bDMARD was recommended for axSpA in case of failure to anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF). The 2022 Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS)-EULAR recommendation proposed to start an alternative bDMARD but without advocating a switch in mode of action as proposed in rheumatoid arthritis. Since 2015, the inhibition of interleukin (IL)-17 has demonstrated efficacy in axSpA. Then, we designed a randomised multicentre clinical trial to identify the more effective treatment after a first anti-TNF failure in axSpA, comparing an anti-IL-17 to a second anti-TNF.
The ROC-SpA (Rotation Or Change of biotherapy after first anti-TNF treatment failure in axSpA patients) study is a prospective, randomised, multicentre, superiority open-label phase IV trial comparing an anti-IL-17 strategy (secukinumab or ixekizumab) to a second TNF blocker in a 1:1 ratio. Patients with an active axSpA (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index >4 or ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS) >3.5) with inadequate 3 months response to a first anti-TNF and with a stable dose of conventional synthetic DMARDs, oral corticosteroids and/or NSAIDs for at least 1 month are included in 31 hospital centres in France and Monaco. The primary outcome is the ASAS40 response at week 24. The secondary outcomes are ASAS40 at weeks 12 and 52, other clinical scores (ASAS20, partial remission rate, ASDAS major improvement rate) at weeks 12, 24 and 52 with the drugs and anti-drugs concentrations at baseline, weeks 12, 24 and 52. The primary analysis is performed at the end of the study according to the intent-to-treat principle.
Ethics approval was obtained from the committee for the protection of persons (Comité de protection des personnes Ouest IV #12/18_1, 6 February 2018) and registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and in EudraCT. Results of this study, whether positive or negative, will be presented at national and international congresses, to national axSpA patient associations and published in a peer-reviewed journal. It could also impact the international recommendation to manage patients with axSpA.
NCT03445845 and EudraCT2017-004700-22.
中轴型脊柱关节炎(axSpA)是一种以炎症性下腰痛为特征的慢性炎症性疾病。非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)被推荐作为 axSpA 的一线治疗药物。如果 NSAIDs 治疗反应不佳,应根据欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)和美国风湿病学会的建议,引入生物改善病情抗风湿药(bDMARDs)。直到 2015 年,只有在抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)失败的情况下,axSpA 才推荐使用 bDMARD。2022 年的强直性脊柱炎国际学会(ASAS)-EULAR 建议提出开始使用另一种 bDMARD,但不主张像类风湿关节炎那样改变作用模式。自 2015 年以来,白细胞介素(IL)-17 的抑制已被证明在 axSpA 中有效。因此,我们设计了一项随机多中心临床试验,以确定 axSpA 患者首次抗 TNF 治疗失败后更有效的治疗方法,比较抗 IL-17 与第二种抗 TNF。
ROC-SpA(首次抗 TNF 治疗失败后 axSpA 患者的生物治疗转换或轮换)研究是一项前瞻性、随机、多中心、优效性、开放标签的 IV 期临床试验,比较了抗 IL-17 策略(司库奇尤单抗或依奇珠单抗)与第二种 TNF 阻滞剂的 1:1 比例。纳入了法国和摩纳哥 31 家医院中心的活动性 axSpA(Bath 强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数>4 或强直性脊柱炎疾病活动评分(ASDAS)>3.5)患者,这些患者在接受一线抗 TNF 治疗后 3 个月反应不足,且稳定剂量的传统合成 DMARDs、口服皮质类固醇和/或 NSAIDs 至少 1 个月。主要结局是第 24 周的 ASAS40 应答。次要结局包括第 12 周和第 52 周的 ASAS40、第 12、24 和 52 周的其他临床评分(ASAS20、部分缓解率、ASDAS 主要改善率)以及基线时、第 12、24 和 52 周时的药物和抗药物浓度。根据意向治疗原则,主要分析在研究结束时进行。
已获得保护人员委员会(Comité de protection des personnes Ouest IV #12/18_1,2018 年 2 月 6 日)的伦理批准,并在 ClinicalTrials.gov 和 EudraCT 中注册。本研究的结果,无论阳性还是阴性,都将在国内外会议、国家 axSpA 患者协会以及同行评议期刊上公布。它还可能影响管理 axSpA 患者的国际建议。
NCT03445845 和 EudraCT2017-004700-22。