Institute of Pharmacy, Faculty of Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraβe 31, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Institute of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Ravila 14a, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.
J Med Chem. 2024 Sep 26;67(18):16664-16691. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c01470. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
The determination of ligand-receptor binding affinities plays a key role in the development process of pharmaceuticals. While the classical radiochemical binding assay uses radioligands, fluorescence-based binding assays require fluorescent probes. Usually, radio- and fluorescence-labeled ligands are dissimilar in terms of structure and bioactivity, and can be used in either radiochemical or fluorescence-based assays. Aiming for a close comparison of both assay types, we synthesized tritiated fluorescent neurotensin receptor ligands ([H], [H]) and their nontritiated analogues (, ). The labeled probes were studied in radiochemical and fluorescence-based (high-content imaging, flow cytometry, fluorescence anisotropy) binding assays. Equilibrium saturation binding yielded well-comparable ligand-receptor affinities, indicating that all these setups can be used for the screening of new drugs. In contrast, discrepancies were found in the kinetic behavior of the probes, which can be attributed to technical differences of the methods and require further studies with respect to the elucidation of the underlying mechanisms.
配体-受体结合亲和力的测定在药物开发过程中起着关键作用。虽然经典的放射化学结合分析使用放射性配体,但基于荧光的结合分析则需要荧光探针。通常情况下,放射性标记和荧光标记的配体在结构和生物活性方面存在差异,可用于放射化学或基于荧光的分析。为了对两种分析类型进行密切比较,我们合成了氚化荧光神经降压素受体配体([H], [H])及其非氚化类似物(, )。对标记探针进行了放射化学和基于荧光的(高内涵成像、流式细胞术、荧光各向异性)结合分析研究。平衡饱和结合产生了可比较的配体-受体亲和力,表明所有这些方法都可用于筛选新药。然而,在探针的动力学行为中发现了差异,这可以归因于方法的技术差异,需要进一步研究以阐明潜在的机制。