Leite do Ó Samylle Danúbia, Behlau Mara, de Abreu Samuel Ribeiro, Englert Marina Taborda, Wanderley Lopes Leonardo
Department of Speech-Language and Hearing Science, Center for Voice Studies - CEV, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Department of Speech-Language and Hearing Science, Federal University of São Paulo - UNIFESP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Department of Speech-Language and Hearing Science, Federal University of Paraíba - UFPB, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil.
J Voice. 2024 Sep 10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.08.027.
To analyze whether there are differences in the cepstral measures obtained in different speech tasks, depending on the presence and degree of vocal deviation, and to analyze if there is a correlation between the cepstral measures obtained from different speech tasks and the general degree of vocal deviation.
Analysis of 258 vocal samples of the sustained vowel [a] and connected speech (counting numbers) from a database, including 160 dysphonic and 98 nondysphonic voices. The counting number samples were edited in three different durations: counting from 1 to 10, from 1 to 11, and from 1 to 20. Five speech-language pathologists (SLPs), voice specialists, carried out the perceptual-auditory judgment of the overall degree of vocal deviation (ODD) using the G from the overall dysphonia grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, and strain (GRBAS) scale. We extracted the cepstral peak prominence (CPP) and smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPPS) measurements from all the vocal samples using an extraction script in the free software Praat.
CPP and CPPS were different between dysphonic and nondysphonic individuals, regardless of the speech task, with lower values for dysphonic. Also, CPP values between the vowel and the connected speech tasks were different between both groups. Only the CPPS showed differences between all the speech tasks depending on the degree of vocal deviation. There was a strong negative correlation between the CPPS, CPPS, CPPS, CPPS and the ODD, and a moderate negative correlation between CPP, CPP, CPP, CPP, and ODD.
There are differences in the cepstral measures obtained in different speech tasks, depending on the presence of dysphonia and ODD. CPP and CPPS values are different between dysphonic and nondysphonic individuals in all speech tasks. There is a moderate negative correlation between CCP in the different speech tasks and ODD, while there is a strong negative correlation between CPPS in the different speech tasks and ODD.
分析在不同言语任务中获得的谐波倒谱测量值是否因嗓音偏差的存在和程度而异,并分析从不同言语任务中获得的谐波倒谱测量值与嗓音偏差的总体程度之间是否存在相关性。
对来自一个数据库的258个持续元音[a]和连贯言语(数数)的嗓音样本进行分析,包括160个发音障碍嗓音和98个无发音障碍嗓音。数数样本被编辑成三种不同时长:从1数到10、从1数到11以及从1数到20。五名言语语言病理学家(SLP),嗓音专家,使用整体发音障碍等级、粗糙度、气息声、无力和紧张(GRBAS)量表中的G对嗓音偏差的总体程度(ODD)进行感知听觉判断。我们使用免费软件Praat中的提取脚本从所有嗓音样本中提取谐波峰值突出度(CPP)和平滑谐波峰值突出度(CPPS)测量值。
无论言语任务如何,发音障碍者和无发音障碍者之间的CPP和CPPS均不同,发音障碍者的值较低。此外,两组中元音和连贯言语任务之间的CPP值也不同。只有CPPS在所有言语任务中根据嗓音偏差程度显示出差异。CPPS与ODD之间存在强负相关,CPP与ODD之间存在中度负相关。
根据发音障碍和ODD的存在情况,不同言语任务中获得的谐波倒谱测量值存在差异。在所有言语任务中,发音障碍者和无发音障碍者之间的CPP和CPPS值不同。不同言语任务中的CCP与ODD之间存在中度负相关,而不同言语任务中的CPPS与ODD之间存在强负相关。