Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Grupo de Investigación Clinimetría F-14, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga y Plataforma en Nanomedicina (IBIMA-Plataforma Bionand), Málaga, Spain.
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Sep 11;24(1):992. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05649-y.
Reducing teacher subjectivity and checking skill corrections have an impact on the manual therapy learning, one of the most crucial components of physical therapy clinical practise. The aim of this study was to analyse the effectiveness of a kinematic real-time feedback strategy (KRTF) with an inertial sensor as a new methodology for the learning of glenohumeral joint mobilisation, comparing it with the traditional teaching method.
This study was a randomised trial. 59 undergraduate students without experience in manual therapy were randomised into two different groups (G1: Traditional methods group; G2: KRTF group). G1: students would practice the technique while an expert in manual therapy would supervise them. G2: could perform the mobilisation and observe the kinematic characteristics of the technique on a laptop. For the two movements that compose the mobilisation (angulation and translation), the result variables extracted were: maximum displacement, minimum displacement, area under the curve and the difference between the area under the curve of angulation and translation. In addition, the consistency of the measurement and reliability were calculated, too.
Some significant differences were observed within groups, between groups and in the group x time interaction, the difference between the angulation and translation area. The synchronization of the movements in in the post comparison was better in G2 because the differences in the areas of both movements were significantly smaller (Mean Difference G1 vs. G2 = 1111.4°s (p > 0.05)).
After comparing the kinematic variables recorded between the two intervention groups analysed in the present study, we observed that the kinematic registers were significantly different between the two groups, with a higher evolution in the KRTF group compared to the traditional learning method. The effectiveness of KRTF was proved over the traditional teaching methods in facilitating the learning process of the glenohumeral joint mobilisation.
NCT02504710, 22/07/2015.
减少教师的主观性和检查技能纠正对物理治疗临床实践中最重要的组成部分之一——手法治疗的学习有影响。本研究的目的是分析一种基于运动学的实时反馈策略(KRTF)与惯性传感器相结合的新方法对肩关节松动术学习的效果,并将其与传统教学方法进行比较。
本研究为随机对照试验。59 名没有手法治疗经验的本科生被随机分为两组(G1:传统方法组;G2:KRTF 组)。G1:学生在手动治疗专家的监督下练习技术。G2:可以在笔记本电脑上观察到技术的运动学特征。对于组成松动的两个运动(角度和平移),提取的结果变量为:最大位移、最小位移、曲线下面积以及角度和平移曲线下面积之间的差异。此外,还计算了测量的一致性和可靠性。
在组内、组间和组间时间交互作用方面观察到一些显著差异,在角度和翻译区域的面积方面存在差异。在 G2 中,运动的同步性在后期比较中更好,因为两个运动的区域差异明显更小(G1 与 G2 之间的差异均值差异为 1111.4°s(p>0.05))。
在比较本研究分析的两个干预组之间记录的运动学变量后,我们观察到两组之间的运动学记录明显不同,与传统学习方法相比,KRTF 组的变化更大。KRTF 在促进肩关节松动术学习过程中的有效性得到了证明,优于传统教学方法。
NCT02504710,2015 年 7 月 22 日。