Diagnostic Accuracy of Immunohistochemical Expression of p16, MDM2, and CDK4 in Well-Differentiated and De-Differentiated Liposarcoma in MDM2 Fluorescent <em>in situ </em>Hybridisation Confirmed Cases.

OBJECTIVE

To establish the diagnostic utility of immunohistochemistry markers p16 along with MDM2 and CDK-4 in confirming the diagnosis of well-differentiated and de-differentiated liposarcoma while taking Fluorescent in situ Hybridisation (FISH) as a gold standard.

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Histopathology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from 30th January 2022 to 30th June 2023.

METHODOLOGY

A standard panel of three immunohistochemistry markers p16, MDM2, and CDK4 were applied to 36 cases of atypical lipomatous tumours, well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS), and de-differentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS), on which the gold standard FISH was already performed. The sample size was calculated with the help of a WHO calculator taking prevalence 1-2% in Pakistani population. Qualitative variables such as gender and site of tumour were presented by calculating frequency and percentages and comparison of Immunohistochemistry results with FISH was done by using a 2x2 table.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of this triple marker panel for detecting WDLPS/DDLPS were 43.47% and 15.38%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of CDK4 for detecting WDLPS / DDLPS were 82.6% and 15.4%, those of MDM2 were 73.9% and 61.5 %, and those of p16 were 60.9% and 53.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Among all three markers, CDK4 was the most sensitive and MDM2 was the most specific marker for detecting WDLPS-DDLPS. It also showed that a combination of these three markers improves the diagnostic credibility of the immunohistochemistry in diagnosing DDLPS and WDLPS but FISH is the most reliable and confirmatory method.

KEY WORDS

De-differentiated liposarcoma, Well-differentiated liposarcoma, P16, CDK4, MDM2.