Suppr超能文献

探索口吃模拟学习和人格特质对言语病理学学生临床自我效能感和专业兴趣的影响。

Exploring the impact of stuttering simulation-based learning and personality traits on clinical self-efficacy and professional interest among speech-language pathology students.

机构信息

Department of Communication Disorders, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.

Department of Communication Disorders, Achva Academic College, Shikmim, Israel.

出版信息

Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Nov-Dec;59(6):2737-2751. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13112. Epub 2024 Sep 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research suggests that participating in a stuttering simulation-based learning (SBL) program could help speech-language pathology (SLP) students feel more at ease, less nervous and more capable while interacting with people who stutter. Personality traits may influence SLP students' self-efficacy beliefs as well as their level of interest in working with clients who stutter. In particular, we suggest that the combination of low neuroticism and high extraversion, previously linked with a more outgoing, emotionally stable and social personality, may enhance self-efficacy.

AIMS

To examine the impact of participating in a stuttering SBL program on clinical self-efficacy (CSE) in managing stuttering therapy among SLP students, as well as its influence on their interest in working with fluency disorders and their associations with personality dimensions. The study also evaluated satisfaction with the SBL experience.

METHODS & PROCEDURES: SLP students (n = 49) underwent a fluency disorders academic course, self-reported on CSE, and had an interest in working in the field of stuttering and NEO-Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Post-stuttering SBL program participation, CSE and level of interest in practice of stuttering were reassessed. Satisfaction with the simulation was also gauged.

OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Students interested in working with fluency disorders scored lower in neuroticism and higher in extraversion than their uninterested counterparts. Before the SBL activity, interest ratings were negatively correlated with neuroticism and positively correlated with extraversion. Pre-SBL neuroticism was negatively correlated with CSE. Following the SBL activity, increased CSE and interest in working with fluency disorders were evident, indicating robust and medium effects of the simulation on those indices, respectively. Post-SBL neuroticism was also negatively correlated with CSE. Overall, participants reported high satisfaction with the SBL experience.

CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: The study suggests SBL is an effective tool for enhancing motivation to work with fluency disorders. Consideration of personality traits and professional interests in designing educational interventions for SLP students, along with tailoring approaches to individual differences, may enhance learning outcomes. The study also highlights the need to differentiate between CSE and objectively assessed clinical competence and the fact that professional development is influenced by various factors. Nonetheless, the positive correlations between personality traits, CSE and satisfaction emphasize the potential of SBL programs in shaping not only clinical skills but also the attitudes and preferences of future SLPs.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on this subject SLPs in the field of stuttering therapy reportedly experience low levels of comfort and professional confidence, possibly due to insufficient clinical experience. According to earlier research, taking part in SBL programs may elevate the CSE of SLP students and help them feel more confident about treating people with stuttering. What this study adds to the existing knowledge In addition to showing the beneficial effects of an SBL activity on SLP students' self-efficacy and interest in working in stuttering therapy, our research shows a significant relationship between personality traits and CSE. Specifically, the combination of high extraversion and low neuroticism was found to be associated with higher CSE and higher levels of satisfaction from the SBL. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The study shows that SBL is an effective tool for enhancing motivation to work with fluency disorders. Overall, students who exhibit high extraversion and low neuroticism show higher levels of CSE, greater motivation in stuttering treatment, and higher levels of SBL stratification. Development of future SBL activities and other educational interventions should take into consideration such personality traits, to enhance learning outcomes.

摘要

背景

研究表明,参与口吃模拟学习(SBL)计划可以帮助言语语言病理学(SLP)学生在与口吃者互动时感到更加自在、不那么紧张和更有能力。个性特征可能会影响 SLP 学生的自我效能信念以及他们对与口吃者合作的兴趣。特别是,我们认为低神经质和高外向性的结合,以前与更外向、情绪稳定和社交的个性有关,可能会增强自我效能感。

目的

检查口吃 SBL 计划对 SLP 学生管理口吃治疗中的临床自我效能感(CSE)的影响,以及其对口吃障碍工作的兴趣的影响,以及与个性维度的关系。该研究还评估了对 SBL 体验的满意度。

方法和程序

49 名 SLP 学生参加了言语流畅性障碍学术课程,报告了 CSE,并对在口吃领域工作的兴趣和 NEO-五因素量表(NEO-FFI)进行了评估。口吃 SBL 计划参与后,重新评估了 CSE 和对口吃实践的兴趣。还评估了对模拟的满意度。

结果和结论

对流畅性障碍工作感兴趣的学生在神经质方面得分较低,在外向性方面得分较高,而不感兴趣的学生则相反。在 SBL 活动之前,兴趣评分与神经质呈负相关,与外向性呈正相关。SBL 前的神经质与 CSE 呈负相关。在 SBL 活动之后,CSE 和对口吃障碍工作的兴趣明显增加,表明模拟对这些指标的影响分别为稳健和中等。SBL 后的神经质也与 CSE 呈负相关。总体而言,参与者对 SBL 体验的满意度很高。

研究表明,SBL 是增强对口吃障碍工作兴趣的有效工具。考虑个性特征和 SLP 学生的专业兴趣,设计教育干预措施,并考虑个体差异,可能会提高学习效果。该研究还强调了需要区分 CSE 和客观评估的临床能力,以及专业发展受多种因素影响的事实。尽管如此,个性特征、CSE 和满意度之间的正相关强调了 SBL 计划不仅可以塑造临床技能,还可以塑造未来 SLP 的态度和偏好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验