Li Peizi, Ni Pu, Haines G Kenneth, Si Qiusheng, Li Xuanyou, Baskovich Brett
Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York, NY, USA.
Department of Pathology, Mount Sinai West New York, NY, USA.
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2024 Aug 15;17(8):236-244. doi: 10.62347/AAPB6946. eCollection 2024.
Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is an aggressive tumor with high recurrence rates and poses a great challenge for clinical management. Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) blockers have been approved for the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma. PD-L1 and HER2 expression in UC will determine whether patients are likely to respond to these targeted treatments. This study assessed the expressions of HER2 and PD-L1 in UC at our institution and investigated their correlations with gender, tumor location (upper genitourinary (GU) tract vs. lower GU tract), tumor stage, and histologic divergent subtypes.
Patients with UC who had PD-L1 or HER2 immunostains performed in the past 3 years at our institution were included in our analysis. A total of 97 cases were identified. PD-L1 and HER2 scores were provided by two experienced GU pathologists. HER2 scores were given according to the criteria used in breast cancer, while PD-L1 scores were reported as the combined positive score. We assessed correlation of the scores with the patients' gender, tumor location, tumor stage, and histologic divergent subtypes. The data for PD-L1 expression were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U Test for gender and urinary tract location, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for stage and histology. The data for HER2 expression were analyzed using the chi-square test. For all analyses, significance was set at P<0.05.
Of the 97 patients, the average age was 69 years. There were 95 patients who had previously reported HER2 results and 86 patients who had PD-L1 results. PD-L1 expression did not show a significant difference among the histological divergent subtypes (P=0.36). However, HER2 status exhibited a significant difference, with more HER2-positive cases observed in the conventional histology (P=0.008). No correlation between HER2 status and either gender or tumor stage was identified. The median PD-L1 combined positive score was significantly higher in lower urinary tract UC than upper (10 and 2, respectively; P=0.049). No significant differences were observed for gender or pathologic stage.
Our data suggest that HER2 is more frequently expressed in conventional UC than in divergent subtypes. Additionally, PD-L1 has a higher expression level in lower urinary tract UC compared to upper. However, PD-L1 and HER2 expression are not related to gender or tumor stage in UC.
尿路上皮癌(UC)是一种侵袭性肿瘤,复发率高,给临床治疗带来巨大挑战。程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)抑制剂和人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阻滞剂已被批准用于治疗晚期尿路上皮癌。UC中PD-L1和HER2的表达将决定患者是否可能对这些靶向治疗产生反应。本研究评估了我院UC中HER2和PD-L1的表达,并探讨了它们与性别、肿瘤位置(上泌尿生殖道与下泌尿生殖道)、肿瘤分期和组织学不同亚型的相关性。
分析我院过去3年进行过PD-L1或HER2免疫染色的UC患者。共确定97例。PD-L1和HER2评分由两位经验丰富的泌尿生殖道病理学家提供。HER2评分根据乳腺癌使用的标准给出,而PD-L1评分报告为综合阳性评分。我们评估了评分与患者性别、肿瘤位置、肿瘤分期和组织学不同亚型的相关性。PD-L1表达数据采用Mann-Whitney U检验分析性别和泌尿道位置差异,采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)分析分期和组织学差异。HER2表达数据采用卡方检验分析。所有分析中,显著性设定为P<0.05。
97例患者的平均年龄为69岁。95例患者先前报告过HER2结果,86例患者有PD-L1结果。PD-L1表达在组织学不同亚型之间无显著差异(P=0.36)。然而,HER2状态存在显著差异,在传统组织学中观察到更多HER2阳性病例(P=0.008)。未发现HER2状态与性别或肿瘤分期之间存在相关性。下尿路UC的PD-L1综合阳性评分中位数显著高于上尿路(分别为10和2;P=0.049)。性别或病理分期未观察到显著差异。
我们的数据表明,HER2在传统UC中的表达比在不同亚型中更频繁。此外,与上尿路UC相比,下尿路UC中PD-L1表达水平更高。然而,UC中PD-L1和HER2的表达与性别或肿瘤分期无关。