Kumar Nitish, Lança Gomes Pedro, Marino Michael J, Miglani Amar, Lal Devyani
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, AZ, United States.
Front Allergy. 2024 Aug 28;5:1456686. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2024.1456686. eCollection 2024.
We compared the efficacy of intralesional sclerotherapy using 3% sodium tetradecyl sulfate with non-sclerotherapy-based treatments for Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia-associated epistaxis management.
This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent surgical intervention for HHT-associated epistaxis management from 01/2010-02/2024. Patients undergoing sclerotherapy with intralesional 3% sodium tetradecyl sulfate were included in the sclerotherapy group and others undergoing conventional non-sclerotherapy-based procedures in the non-sclerotherapy group. Outcomes like breakthrough epistaxis, emergency visits, intra-op blood loss, blood transfusions, and procedure complications in the 3-month perioperative period were compared.
Twenty-three patients who underwent 74 intranasal procedures were identified. In the sclerotherapy group, 17 patients underwent 47 procedures. In the non-sclerotherapy group, 10 patients underwent 27 procedures. Till the 3rd post-treatment month, fewer breakthrough epistaxis episodes were observed after sclerotherapy procedures (13/47) vs. non-sclerotherapy procedures (14/27); ( = 0.037). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower during sclerotherapy (median: 10 ml) vs. non-sclerotherapy procedures (median: 50 ml); < 0.001. The time interval between successive procedures was not significantly different in the sclerotherapy (median 6.5 months) vs. the non-sclerotherapy group (median 3.5 months); = 0.13. Nasal crusting was the most common complication in the sclerotherapy group (36.9%). Two patients in each group had new onset septal perforation, none of the patients had vision loss or cerebrovascular accident. One emergency department visit was reported in the sclerotherapy group vs. 7 (in 3 patients) in the non-sclerotherapy group.
Compared to non-sclerotherapy treatments, intralesional sclerotherapy for epistaxis in HHT is more effective in decreasing breakthrough epistaxis, and has lower intraoperative blood loss.
我们比较了使用3%十四烷基硫酸钠进行病灶内硬化治疗与基于非硬化治疗的方法在治疗遗传性出血性毛细血管扩张症相关性鼻出血方面的疗效。
这是一项对2010年1月至2024年2月期间因遗传性出血性毛细血管扩张症相关性鼻出血接受手术干预的患者的回顾性研究。接受病灶内3%十四烷基硫酸钠硬化治疗的患者被纳入硬化治疗组,其他接受传统非硬化治疗方法的患者被纳入非硬化治疗组。比较围手术期3个月内的鼻出血复发、急诊就诊、术中失血、输血及手术并发症等结果。
共确定23例患者接受了74次鼻内手术。硬化治疗组17例患者接受了47次手术。非硬化治疗组10例患者接受了27次手术。直到治疗后第3个月,硬化治疗术后观察到的鼻出血复发次数(13/47)少于非硬化治疗术后(14/27);(P = 0.037)。硬化治疗术中的失血量(中位数:10毫升)显著低于非硬化治疗手术(中位数:50毫升);P < 0.001。硬化治疗组(中位数6.5个月)与非硬化治疗组(中位数3.5个月)连续手术之间的时间间隔无显著差异;P = 0.13。鼻痂形成是硬化治疗组最常见的并发症(36.9%)。每组各有2例患者出现新的鼻中隔穿孔,所有患者均未出现视力丧失或脑血管意外。硬化治疗组报告了1次急诊就诊,而非硬化治疗组有7次(3例患者)。
与非硬化治疗相比,遗传性出血性毛细血管扩张症鼻出血的病灶内硬化治疗在减少鼻出血复发方面更有效,且术中失血量更低。