• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特发性全层黄斑裂孔直径与解剖学闭合率的Meta回归分析:对术中技术的启示

Meta-regression of idiopathic full-thickness macular holes diameter and anatomical closure rate: Implications to intraoperative technique.

作者信息

Zhang Ruiheng, Fang Yan-Cheng, Shi Xuhan, Wu Haotian, Yu Chuyao, Li Yitong, Zhou Wenda, Li Heyan, Zhang Chuan, Zhou Yan-Feng, Dong Li, Wei Wenbin

机构信息

Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Intraocular Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab, Medical Artificial Intelligence Research and Verification Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, 1 Dong Jiao Min Lane, Beijing, 100730, China.

Department of Ophthalmology, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No.218, Jixi Road, Shushan District, Hefei, Anhui, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Aug 20;10(17):e36588. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36588. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36588
PMID:39263185
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11387363/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Primary surgery failure of macular holes causes poor visual acuity outcomes. Several studies indicate that small-medium idiopathic full-thickness macular holes (iFTMH) have consistent and high anatomical closure rates after vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, regardless of iFTMH diameters. However, there is no systematic analysis examining the relationship between iFTMH diameters and anatomical closure rates.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-regression, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases on October 24th, 2022. We included studies regarding iFTMH, with ILM peeling/inverted flap technique, long-lasting gas tamponade, and face-down position after surgery. Univariable meta-regression with a restricted cubic spline model and component-plus-residual plot after covariables adjustment were used to explore non-linear association.

RESULTS

A total of 7257 participants from 19 randomized controlled trials and 49 observational studies were included in this meta-analysis. In ILM peeling group, every 100-μm increment in diameter was associated with a 3.8 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.8%-5.7 %,  < 0.001) relatively lower anatomical closure rate. Yet, among studies using the inverted flap technique, baseline iFTMH diameter was not associated with a lower anatomical closure rate (0.2 %, 95%CI, -4.2 %-4.5 %,  > 0.9). The restricted cubic spline model and component-plus-residual plot controlling for age, sex, and symptom duration prior to surgery showed no evident non-linearity in both surgical techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

The iFTMH diameter is linear and inversely associated with the anatomical closure rate after the ILM peeling technique, but not with the inverted flap technique. The present study supports the use of advanced techniques, e.g., inverted flap technique, in small-medium iFTMH to improve anatomical closure rates.

摘要

目的

黄斑裂孔一期手术失败会导致视力预后不佳。多项研究表明,无论特发性全层黄斑裂孔(iFTMH)直径大小,玻璃体切割联合内界膜(ILM)剥除术后,中小尺寸的iFTMH具有一致且较高的解剖学闭合率。然而,尚无系统分析研究iFTMH直径与解剖学闭合率之间的关系。

方法

在这项系统评价和meta回归分析中,我们于2022年10月24日检索了PubMed、Embase和Web of Science数据库。我们纳入了有关iFTMH、采用ILM剥除/翻转瓣技术、长效气体填塞以及术后俯卧位的研究。使用受限立方样条模型进行单变量meta回归分析,并在调整协变量后绘制成分加残差图,以探索非线性关联。

结果

本meta分析共纳入了来自19项随机对照试验和49项观察性研究的7257名参与者。在ILM剥除组中,直径每增加100μm,解剖学闭合率相对降低3.8%(95%置信区间[CI],1.8%-5.7%,P<0.001)。然而,在采用翻转瓣技术的研究中,基线iFTMH直径与较低的解剖学闭合率无关(0.2%,95%CI,-4.2%-4.5%,P>0.9)。在控制年龄、性别和术前症状持续时间的情况下,受限立方样条模型和成分加残差图显示两种手术技术均无明显的非线性关系。

结论

iFTMH直径与ILM剥除技术后的解剖学闭合率呈线性负相关,但与翻转瓣技术无关。本研究支持在中小尺寸的iFTMH中使用先进技术,如翻转瓣技术,以提高解剖学闭合率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5c1/11387363/fce2d3f5e38f/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5c1/11387363/fe19fe60298a/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5c1/11387363/820daf7f522e/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5c1/11387363/76661d3c0a97/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5c1/11387363/fce2d3f5e38f/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5c1/11387363/fe19fe60298a/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5c1/11387363/820daf7f522e/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5c1/11387363/76661d3c0a97/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5c1/11387363/fce2d3f5e38f/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Meta-regression of idiopathic full-thickness macular holes diameter and anatomical closure rate: Implications to intraoperative technique.特发性全层黄斑裂孔直径与解剖学闭合率的Meta回归分析:对术中技术的启示
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 20;10(17):e36588. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36588. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
2
Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane flap versus pars plana vitrectomy with conventional internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular hole.玻切联合内界膜瓣翻转术与常规玻切联合内界膜剥除术治疗大孔性黄斑裂孔的对比。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 7;8(8):CD015031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015031.pub2.
3
The Effect of Macular Hole Duration on Surgical Outcomes: An Individual Participant Data Study of Randomized Controlled Trials.黄斑裂孔持续时间对手术结果的影响:一项随机对照试验的个体参与者数据研究。
Ophthalmology. 2023 Feb;130(2):152-163. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.08.028. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
4
Comparison of the use of internal limiting membrane flaps versus conventional ILM peeling on post-operative anatomical and visual outcomes in large macular holes.比较内界膜瓣与传统内界膜剥除术对大孔性黄斑裂孔术后解剖和视力结果的影响。
Eye (Lond). 2024 Jul;38(10):1876-1881. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03024-1. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
5
Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Large Macular Holes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.内界膜翻转瓣技术与内界膜剥除术治疗大黄斑裂孔:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(5):713-722. doi: 10.1159/000515283. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
6
Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling versus vitrectomy with no peeling for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole (FTMH).玻璃体切除术联合内界膜(ILM)剥除术与单纯玻璃体切除术治疗特发性全层黄斑裂孔(FTMH)的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 5(6):CD009306. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009306.pub2.
7
Comparative efficacy evaluation of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.大孔性黄斑病变中内界膜翻转瓣技术与内界膜剥除术的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan 8;20(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1271-2.
8
Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling versus inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for macular hole-induced retinal detachment: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.玻璃体切除术联合内界膜剥除术与内界膜翻转瓣技术治疗黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离:文献系统评价与Meta分析
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov 28;17(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0619-8.
9
Anatomical and functional results after vitrectomy with conventional ILM peeling versus inverted ILM flap technique in large full-thickness macular holes.在大型全层黄斑裂孔中,采用传统内界膜剥除术与内界膜翻转瓣技术进行玻璃体切除术后的解剖学和功能结果。
Int J Retina Vitreous. 2023 Nov 14;9(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s40942-023-00509-1.
10
Comparative study of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap and ILM peeling technique in large macular holes: a randomized-control trial.倒置内界膜(ILM)瓣与ILM剥除技术治疗大黄斑裂孔的对比研究:一项随机对照试验
BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul 20;18(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0826-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Modified two-needle technique of air/fluid exchange for in-office treatment of unhealed macular hole.改良双针气/液交换技术用于门诊治疗未愈合的黄斑裂孔
Int J Retina Vitreous. 2025 Jul 14;11(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s40942-025-00705-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Air vs Gas Tamponade During Macular Hole Repair Surgery.黄斑裂孔修复手术中空气与气体填塞的比较
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2020 Mar 27;4(5):360-363. doi: 10.1177/2474126420914276. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct.
2
EXCESSIVE GLIOSIS AFTER VITRECTOMY FOR THE HIGHLY MYOPIC MACULAR HOLE: A Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Study.高度近视黄斑孔玻璃体切除术后的过度神经胶质化:频域光学相干断层扫描研究。
Retina. 2023 Feb 1;43(2):200-208. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003657.
3
The Effect of Macular Hole Duration on Surgical Outcomes: An Individual Participant Data Study of Randomized Controlled Trials.
黄斑裂孔持续时间对手术结果的影响:一项随机对照试验的个体参与者数据研究。
Ophthalmology. 2023 Feb;130(2):152-163. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.08.028. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
4
Functional Outcome After Macular Hole Surgery: Comparison of Standard Perimetry with Microperimetry.黄斑裂孔手术后的功能预后:标准视野检查与微视野检查的比较
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul 11;16:2235-2243. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S367431. eCollection 2022.
5
Visual improvement and regeneration of retinal layers in eyes with small, medium, and large idiopathic full-thickness macular holes treated with the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique over a period of 12 months.12 个月内采用反转内界膜瓣技术治疗小、中、大特发性全层黄斑孔后眼的视网膜层的视力改善和再生。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct;260(10):3161-3171. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05676-9. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
6
Combined epiretinal and internal limiting membrane retracting door flaps for large macular holes associated with epiretinal membranes.联合内界膜和视网膜前膜反折瓣治疗与视网膜前膜相关的大黄斑裂孔。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug;260(8):2433-2436. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05608-7. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
7
Multilayered inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus standard internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular holes: A comparative study.多层反转内界膜瓣技术与标准内界膜剥除治疗大孔性黄斑裂孔的对比研究。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar;70(3):909-913. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1530_21.
8
ILM peeling with ILM flap transposition vs. classic ILM peeling for small and medium macula holes-a prospective randomized trial.内界膜剥离联合内界膜瓣转位术与经典内界膜剥离术治疗中小黄斑裂孔的前瞻性随机试验
Spektrum Augenheilkd. 2023;37(1):9-14. doi: 10.1007/s00717-022-00515-y. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
9
Impact of the Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Diameter on Large Idiopathic Macular Hole Closure: Comparative Randomized Study.内界膜瓣直径对特发性大孔性黄斑裂孔闭合的影响:比较随机研究。
10
Management of refractory and recurrent macular holes: A comprehensive review.难治性和复发性黄斑裂孔的处理:全面综述。
Surv Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul-Aug;67(4):908-931. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2022.01.006. Epub 2022 Jan 31.