Rengifo Camilo, Novoa Maria Paula, Cobo Martha, Figueredo Manuel
Department of Mathematics, Physics and Statistics, Universidad de La Sabana, Campus Universitario Puente del Común, Km. 7 Autopista Norte, Bogotá, Colombia.
Energy, Materials and Environment Laboratory, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de La Sabana, Campus Universitario Puente del Común, Km. 7 Autopista Norte, Bogotá, Colombia.
Data Brief. 2024 Jul 23;56:110765. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2024.110765. eCollection 2024 Oct.
The data presented in this article is generated by a steady-state simulation for performing a techno-economic assessment for comparing three electrolysis technologies in the PtM context. The data is focused on two aspects. First, the description of the steady-state simulation of six PtM systems modeled using Aspen Custom Modeler (ACM) and Aspen Plus (AP). Second, an economic assessment is carried out for each of the mentioned PtM systems to compare the feasibility, the profitability and performance of these systems on a larger scale to produce synthetic natural gas, power generation and carbon utilization given in the main research article. Three electrolysis technologies (namely Alkaline Electrolysis - AE, Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolysis - PEME and Solid Oxide Electrolysis - SOE) were modeled having in mind two methane applications: a combined cycle for power generation and the syngas generation. In addition, on each PtM system is carried out an economic evaluation by calculating fixed capital investment (FCI) and manufacturing costs (MC).
本文所呈现的数据是通过稳态模拟生成的,用于在质子膜(PtM)背景下对三种电解技术进行技术经济评估。该数据聚焦于两个方面。其一,使用Aspen定制建模器(ACM)和Aspen Plus(AP)对六个PtM系统进行稳态模拟的描述。其二,对上述每个PtM系统进行经济评估,以在更大规模上比较这些系统生产合成天然气、发电和碳利用的可行性、盈利能力和性能,这在主要研究文章中有提及。考虑到两种甲烷应用:用于发电的联合循环和合成气生产,对三种电解技术(即碱性电解 - AE、质子交换膜电解 - PEME和固体氧化物电解 - SOE)进行了建模。此外,通过计算固定资本投资(FCI)和制造成本(MC),对每个PtM系统进行经济评估。