• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估经济处罚对医院获得性感染的影响。

Evaluating the Effect of Financial Penalty on Hospital-Acquired Infections.

作者信息

Wood Dan M, Beauvais Brad, Sturdivant Rodney X, Kim Forest S

机构信息

Graduate Program in Health and Business Administration, Army-Baylor University, San Antonio, TX, USA.

School of Health Administration, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA.

出版信息

Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Sep 7;17:2181-2190. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S469424. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S469424
PMID:39263552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11389712/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study explores the effects of CMS reimbursement financial penalties from the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program (HACRP) on hospital-acquired infections (HAI) in hospitals across the United States.

METHODS

Hospital-level data for 2896 hospitals in the United States were evaluated using multiple linear regression models with random effects analysis through a difference-in-differences study design to examine HAIs under the HACRP between hospitals that were financially penalized or not from calendar years 2013 to 2020.

RESULTS

This study showed significant differences from the pre-program Total HAC scores to the most recent reviewed year, validating the efficacy of the HACRP, and showing a reduction of overall HAIs over the years evaluated in the study. The multiple linear regression model with random effects analysis produced a significant ( < 0.001) interaction term between hospitals expected to be penalized in 2013 and each year evaluated in the study (-0.412 estimate) confirming decreases in HAI scores, and overall decreases in HAIs across the years of the study. Notably, 98% of hospitals in the worst-performing, expected to be financially penalized quartile from 2013, were found to have decreased their HAIs in their facilities, while only 38.8% of hospital in the performing, non-penalized quartiles showed decreases in HAIs across their facilities, by 2020.

CONCLUSION

Our research indicates that implementing financial disincentives through reimbursement reductions could potentially decrease the incidence of HAIs. Our study further suggests that incorporating financial penalties and incentives for HAIs annually across all hospitals may lead to significant reductions in HAIs throughout the US healthcare system.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)针对医院获得性疾病减少计划(HACRP)实施的报销财务处罚对美国各医院医院获得性感染(HAI)的影响。

方法

通过双重差分研究设计,使用具有随机效应分析的多元线性回归模型,对美国2896家医院的医院层面数据进行评估,以研究2013年至2020年期间受到或未受到财务处罚的医院在HACRP下的医院获得性感染情况。

结果

本研究显示,从计划实施前的总HAC分数到最近一次审查年份存在显著差异,验证了HACRP的有效性,并表明在本研究评估的年份中总体医院获得性感染有所减少。具有随机效应分析的多元线性回归模型在预计2013年受到处罚的医院与研究中评估的每年之间产生了显著(<0.001)的交互项(估计值为-0.412),证实了医院获得性感染分数的下降以及研究各年份中总体医院获得性感染的下降。值得注意的是,到2020年,预计在2013年处于表现最差、预计受到财务处罚四分位数的医院中,98%的医院其设施内的医院获得性感染有所减少,而在表现良好、未受处罚四分位数的医院中,只有38.8%的医院其设施内的医院获得性感染有所减少。

结论

我们的研究表明,通过减少报销实施财务抑制措施可能会降低医院获得性感染的发生率。我们的研究进一步表明,每年对所有医院的医院获得性感染实施财务处罚和激励措施,可能会使美国医疗保健系统中的医院获得性感染显著减少。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Effect of Financial Penalty on Hospital-Acquired Infections.评估经济处罚对医院获得性感染的影响。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Sep 7;17:2181-2190. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S469424. eCollection 2024.
2
Measurement matters: changing penalty calculations under the hospital acquired condition reduction program (HACRP) cost hospitals millions.衡量标准很重要:根据医院获得性条件降低计划(HACRP)的处罚计算方式的改变,使医院损失了数百万美元。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 10;21(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06108-w.
3
Association of Stratification by Proportion of Patients Dually Enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid With Financial Penalties in the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program.按同时参加联邦医疗保险和医疗补助计划的患者比例分层与医院获得性条件削减计划中的经济处罚之间的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Mar 1;181(3):330-338. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.7386.
4
Reimbursement Penalties and 30-Day Readmissions Following Total Joint Arthroplasty.全关节置换术后的报销处罚与30天再入院情况
JB JS Open Access. 2020 Jul 9;5(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00072. eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep.
5
Changes in hospital safety following penalties in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program: retrospective cohort study.美国医院获得性条件减少计划实施处罚后医院安全状况的变化:回顾性队列研究。
BMJ. 2019 Jul 3;366:l4109. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4109.
6
A Comparison of Estimated Cost Savings from Potential Reductions in Hospital-Acquired Conditions to Levied Penalties Under the CMS Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program.比较根据医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)医院获得性疾病减少计划,因潜在减少医院获得性疾病而估计节省的成本与征收的罚款。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020 Aug;46(8):438-447. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.05.002. Epub 2020 May 11.
7
Medicare's Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program Disproportionately Affects Minority-serving Hospitals: Variation by Race, Socioeconomic Status, and Disproportionate Share Hospital Payment Receipt.医疗保险的医院获得性条件减少计划不成比例地影响服务少数族裔的医院:按种族、社会经济地位和不成比例的医院支付份额划分的差异。
Ann Surg. 2020 Jun;271(6):985-993. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003564.
8
Evaluation of the Methods Used by Medicare's Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program to Identify Outlier Hospitals for Surgical Site Infection.医疗保险医院获得性条件减少计划用于确定手术部位感染异常值医院的方法评估。
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Sep;227(3):346-356. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
9
The Hospital-Acquired Conditions (HAC) reduction program: using cranberry treatment to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections and avoid Medicare payment reduction penalties.医院获得性疾病(HAC)减少计划:采用蔓越莓治疗以减少导尿管相关的尿路感染并避免医疗保险支付减少处罚。
J Med Econ. 2018 Jan;21(1):97-106. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1396993. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
10
Hospital Characteristics Associated With Penalties in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program.与医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心医院获得性条件减少计划相关的医院特征。
JAMA. 2015 Jul 28;314(4):375-83. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8609.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical and economic burden of healthcare-associated infections: A prospective cohort study.医疗保健相关性感染的临床和经济负担:一项前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 23;18(2):e0282141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282141. eCollection 2023.
2
Improving the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program through Rulemaking.通过制定规则改进医院获得性疾病减少计划。
JAMA Health Forum. 2020 May;1(5). doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2020.0416. Epub 2020 May 22.
3
Changes in Hospital-acquired Conditions and Mortality Associated With the Hospital-acquired Condition Reduction Program.
医院获得性条件的变化与医院获得性条件减少计划相关的死亡率。
Ann Surg. 2021 Oct 1;274(4):e301-e307. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003641.
4
Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program Is Not Associated With Additional Patient Safety Improvement.医院获得性条件减少计划与额外的患者安全改善无关。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Nov;38(11):1858-1865. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05504.
5
Changes in hospital safety following penalties in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program: retrospective cohort study.美国医院获得性条件减少计划实施处罚后医院安全状况的变化:回顾性队列研究。
BMJ. 2019 Jul 3;366:l4109. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4109.
6
Health care-associated infections - an overview.医疗保健相关感染——概述
Infect Drug Resist. 2018 Nov 15;11:2321-2333. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S177247. eCollection 2018.
7
Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US.医疗差错——美国第三大死因。
BMJ. 2016 May 3;353:i2139. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2139.
8
Effect of Medicare's nonpayment for Hospital-Acquired Conditions: lessons for future policy.医疗保险不支付医院获得性疾病的影响:对未来政策的教训。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Mar;175(3):347-54. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5486.
9
Why We Should Not Be Indifferent to Specification Choices for Difference-in-Differences.为何我们不应忽视双重差分法中的设定选择
Health Serv Res. 2015 Aug;50(4):1211-35. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12270. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
10
Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: the difference-in-differences approach.评估医疗保健政策变化的方法:双重差分法
JAMA. 2014 Dec 10;312(22):2401-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.16153.