Department of Laboratory Medicine and Research Institute of Bacterial Resistance, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Seoul Clinical Laboratories, Yongin-si, South Korea.
J Clin Microbiol. 2024 Oct 16;62(10):e0117524. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01175-24. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are pervasive and prevalent in both community and hospital settings. Recent trends in the changes of the causative microorganisms in these infections could affect the effectiveness of urinalysis (UA). We aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of UA for urinary culture test results according to the causative microorganisms. In addition, UA results were integrated with artificial intelligence (AI) methods to improve the predictive power. A total of 360,376 suspected UTI patients were enrolled from two university hospitals and one commercial laboratory. To ensure broad model applicability, only a limited range of clinical data available from commercial laboratories was used in the analyses. Overall, 53,408 (14.8%) patients were identified as having a positive urine culture. Among the UA tests, the combination of leukocyte esterase and nitrite tests showed the highest area under the curve (AUROC, 0.766; 95% CI, 0.764-0.768) for predicting urine culture positivity but performed poorly for Gram-positive bacteriuria (0.642; 0.637-0.647). The application of an AI model improved the predictive power of the model for urine culture results to an AUROC of 0.872 (0.870-0.875), and the model showed superior performance metrics not only for Gram-negative bacteriuria (0.901; 0.899-0.902) but also for Gram-positive bacteriuria (0.745; 0.740-0.749) and funguria (0.872; 0.865-0.879). As the prevalence of non--caused UTIs increases, the performance of UA in predicting UTIs could be compromised. The addition of AI technologies has shown potential for improving the predictive performance of UA for urine culture results.IMPORTANCEUA had good performance in predicting urine culture results caused by Gram-negative bacteria, especially for and bacteriuria, but had limitations in predicting urine culture results caused by Gram-positive bacteria, including and . We developed and externally validated an AI model incorporating minimal demographic information of patients (age and sex) and laboratory data for UA, complete blood count, and serum creatinine concentrations. The AI model exhibited improved performance in predicting urine culture results across all the causative microorganisms, including Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, and fungi.
尿路感染(UTI)在社区和医院环境中普遍存在。这些感染中致病微生物的变化趋势可能会影响尿分析(UA)的有效性。我们旨在根据致病微生物评估 UA 对尿液培养试验结果的预测性能。此外,将 UA 结果与人工智能(AI)方法相结合以提高预测能力。共纳入来自两所大学医院和一家商业实验室的 360376 例疑似 UTI 患者。为了确保模型具有广泛的适用性,仅使用商业实验室提供的有限范围的临床数据进行分析。总的来说,53408(14.8%)例患者的尿液培养呈阳性。在 UA 检测中,白细胞酯酶和亚硝酸盐检测的联合检测对预测尿液培养阳性的曲线下面积(AUROC,0.766;95%CI,0.764-0.768)最高,但对革兰氏阳性菌尿的预测效果不佳(0.642;0.637-0.647)。AI 模型的应用提高了模型对尿液培养结果的预测能力,AUROC 达到 0.872(0.870-0.875),该模型不仅对革兰氏阴性菌尿(0.901;0.899-0.902)而且对革兰氏阳性菌尿(0.745;0.740-0.749)和真菌尿(0.872;0.865-0.879)的表现指标均优于模型。随着非病因性 UTI 的患病率增加,UA 预测 UTI 的性能可能会受到影响。添加 AI 技术已显示出改善 UA 对尿液培养结果预测性能的潜力。
UA 在预测革兰氏阴性菌引起的尿液培养结果方面表现良好,特别是对 和 菌尿,但在预测革兰氏阳性菌引起的尿液培养结果方面存在局限性,包括 和 菌尿。我们开发并外部验证了一个 AI 模型,该模型包含患者(年龄和性别)和实验室数据的最小人口统计学信息,包括 UA、全血细胞计数和血清肌酐浓度。AI 模型在预测所有致病微生物(包括革兰氏阳性菌、革兰氏阴性菌和真菌)的尿液培养结果方面均表现出改善的性能。