• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人工智能云平台支持乳腺癌局部区域治疗的共同决策:灰姑娘临床试验中多维评估方案

Artificial-Intelligence Cloud-Based Platform to Support Shared Decision-Making in the Locoregional Treatment of Breast Cancer: Protocol for a Multidimensional Evaluation Embedded in the CINDERELLA Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Borsoi Ludovica, Listorti Elisabetta, Ciani Oriana

机构信息

Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Pharmacoecon Open. 2024 Nov;8(6):945-959. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00519-1. Epub 2024 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1007/s41669-024-00519-1
PMID:39264499
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11499581/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shared decision-making (SDM) plays a crucial role in breast cancer care by empowering patients and reducing decision regret. Patient decision aids (PtDAs) are valuable tools for facilitating SDM, now available in digital and artificial intelligence (AI)-powered formats to offer increasingly personalized contents. The ongoing CINDERELLA clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05196269) evaluates an innovative AI cloud-based approach using a web platform and a mobile application (CINDERELLA APProach) versus the conventional approach to support SDM in breast cancer patients undergoing locoregional treatment. This protocol outlines a trial-based multidimensional evaluation, encompassing economic, financial, implementability, and environmental considerations associated with the CINDERELLA APProach.

METHODS

A within-trial cost-consequence and cost-utility analysis from a societal perspective will be performed using patient-level data on outcomes and resource use. The latter will be valued in monetary terms using country-specific unit costs or patient valuations. A budget impact analysis will be performed over 1 and 5 years from the budget holder perspectives. The CINDERELLA APProach implementability will be assessed through an evaluation of its usability, acceptability, organizational impact, and overall feasibility. The environmental impact will be quantitatively assessed across several dimensions, such as quantity, appropriateness, and emissions, supplemented by qualitative insights. Overall, data for the evaluation will be gathered from patient questionnaires, interviews with patients and managers, focus groups with healthcare professionals, and app electronic data.

DISCUSSION

A thorough understanding of the broad consequences of the CINDERELLA APProach may foster its successful translation into real-world settings, hopefully benefiting breast cancer patients and clinical practice.

摘要

背景

共同决策(SDM)通过赋予患者权力和减少决策遗憾,在乳腺癌护理中发挥着关键作用。患者决策辅助工具(PtDAs)是促进共同决策的宝贵工具,现在有数字和人工智能(AI)驱动的形式,可提供越来越个性化的内容。正在进行的灰姑娘临床试验(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT05196269)评估了一种创新的基于AI云的方法,该方法使用网络平台和移动应用程序(灰姑娘方法)与传统方法,以支持接受局部区域治疗的乳腺癌患者进行共同决策。本方案概述了基于试验的多维评估,包括与灰姑娘方法相关的经济、财务、可实施性和环境考虑因素。

方法

将从社会角度进行试验内成本后果和成本效用分析,使用关于结果和资源使用的患者层面数据。后者将使用特定国家的单位成本或患者估值以货币形式进行估值。将从预算持有者的角度进行1年和5年的预算影响分析。灰姑娘方法的可实施性将通过对其可用性、可接受性、组织影响和总体可行性的评估来评估。环境影响将在几个维度上进行定量评估,如数量、适当性和排放,并辅以定性见解。总体而言,评估数据将从患者问卷、患者和管理人员访谈、医疗保健专业人员焦点小组以及应用程序电子数据中收集。

讨论

全面了解灰姑娘方法的广泛后果可能有助于其成功转化为实际应用场景,有望使乳腺癌患者和临床实践受益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d4c/11499581/d845efeed186/41669_2024_519_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d4c/11499581/d845efeed186/41669_2024_519_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d4c/11499581/d845efeed186/41669_2024_519_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Artificial-Intelligence Cloud-Based Platform to Support Shared Decision-Making in the Locoregional Treatment of Breast Cancer: Protocol for a Multidimensional Evaluation Embedded in the CINDERELLA Clinical Trial.基于人工智能云平台支持乳腺癌局部区域治疗的共同决策:灰姑娘临床试验中多维评估方案
Pharmacoecon Open. 2024 Nov;8(6):945-959. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00519-1. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
2
Evaluating the ability of an artificial-intelligence cloud-based platform designed to provide information prior to locoregional therapy for breast cancer in improving patient's satisfaction with therapy: The CINDERELLA trial.评估一个人工智能云平台在提供乳腺癌局部区域治疗前信息方面的能力,以提高患者对治疗的满意度:CINDERELLA 试验。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 3;18(8):e0289365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289365. eCollection 2023.
3
Developing and evaluating an interprofessional shared decision-making care model for patients with perinatal depression in maternal care in urban China: a study protocol.在中国城市的孕产妇保健中为围产期抑郁症患者开发和评估一种跨专业共享决策护理模式:一项研究方案。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Nov 3;24(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02179-2.
4
The Momentum trial: the efficacy of using a smartphone application to promote patient activation and support shared decision making in people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia in outpatient treatment settings: a randomized controlled single-blind trial.动力试验:使用智能手机应用程序促进门诊治疗环境中诊断为精神分裂症患者的患者激活和支持共享决策的效果:一项随机对照单盲试验。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 17;19(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2143-2.
5
Evaluation of a program for routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: study protocol of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.评估癌症护理中常规实施共享决策的方案:一项阶梯式楔形集群随机试验的研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2018 Mar 27;13(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0740-y.
6
Adapting and Evaluating an AI-Based Chatbot Through Patient and Stakeholder Engagement to Provide Information for Different Health Conditions: Master Protocol for an Adaptive Platform Trial (the MARVIN Chatbots Study).通过患者和利益相关者参与来调整和评估基于人工智能的聊天机器人,以提供针对不同健康状况的信息:适应性平台试验的主方案(MARVIN聊天机器人研究)
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Feb 13;13:e54668. doi: 10.2196/54668.
7
An innovative web-based decision-aid about birth after cesarean for shared decision making in Taiwan: study protocol for a randomized control trial.一个关于台湾剖宫产后分娩的创新网络决策辅助工具:用于共享决策的随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Feb 9;24(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07103-8.
8
Investigating the Impact of AI on Shared Decision-Making in Post-Kidney Transplant Care (PRIMA-AI): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.探究人工智能对肾移植后护理中共同决策的影响(PRIMA-AI):一项随机对照试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Apr 1;13:e54857. doi: 10.2196/54857.
9
Implementing shared decision-making interventions in breast cancer clinical practice: a scoping review.在乳腺癌临床实践中实施共同决策干预措施:范围综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Aug 23;23(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02263-8.
10
Evaluating the Impact of a Shared Decision-making Intervention for Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma: The SDM-RCC Study Protocol.评估共同决策干预对肾细胞癌患者的影响:SDM-RCC研究方案
Eur Urol Oncol. 2025 Apr;8(2):245-248. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.003. Epub 2024 Sep 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards for Interventions That Use Artificial Intelligence (CHEERS-AI).人工智能干预措施的综合健康经济评估报告标准 (CHEERS-AI)。
Value Health. 2024 Sep;27(9):1196-1205. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.05.006. Epub 2024 May 23.
2
Implementing shared decision-making interventions in breast cancer clinical practice: a scoping review.在乳腺癌临床实践中实施共同决策干预措施:范围综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Aug 23;23(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02263-8.
3
Evaluating the ability of an artificial-intelligence cloud-based platform designed to provide information prior to locoregional therapy for breast cancer in improving patient's satisfaction with therapy: The CINDERELLA trial.
评估一个人工智能云平台在提供乳腺癌局部区域治疗前信息方面的能力,以提高患者对治疗的满意度:CINDERELLA 试验。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 3;18(8):e0289365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289365. eCollection 2023.
4
Environmental impact assessment in health technology assessment: principles, approaches, and challenges.健康技术评估中的环境影响评估:原则、方法和挑战。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Feb 23;39(1):e13. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323000041.
5
Frequency and Influencing Factors of Shared Decision Making Among Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.手术治疗的乳腺癌患者中共同决策的频率和影响因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2023 Jan;23(1):e20-e31. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.10.007. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
6
For which decisions is Shared Decision Making considered appropriate? - A systematic review.共同决策被认为适用于哪些决策?——一项系统综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Jan;106:3-16. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.09.015. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
7
Systematic Review of Health Economic Evaluations Focused on Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: The Tortoise and the Cheetah.人工智能在医疗保健领域的健康经济评估的系统评价:龟兔赛跑。
Value Health. 2022 Mar;25(3):340-349. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1362. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
8
Implementability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a conceptual framework.医疗干预措施的实施性:综述概述与概念框架的制定。
Implement Sci. 2022 Jan 27;17(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01171-7.
9
The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health.用于评估移动健康的满意度、可用性、接受度和质量结果的最常用问卷。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jan 27;22(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01764-2.
10
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations.2022 年健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS 2022)声明:健康经济评估报告的更新指南。
BMC Med. 2022 Jan 12;20(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02204-0.