Department of Microbiology and Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center, Bu-Ali Research Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Department of Microbiology and Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; Student Research Committee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
J Psychiatr Res. 2024 Nov;179:92-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.09.009. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
BACKGROUND: Recent researches highlighted the significant role of the gut-brain axis and gut microbiota in autism spectrum disorder (ASD), a neurobehavioral developmental disorder characterized by a variety of neuropsychiatric and gastrointestinal symptoms, suggesting that alterations in the gut microbiota may correlate with the severity of ASD symptoms. Therefore, this study was designed to conduct a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of probiotic interventions in ameliorating behavioral symptoms in individuals with ASD. METHODS: This study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. A comprehensive literature search was performed across multiple databases including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar up until June 2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed published randomized clinical trials (RCTs), focusing on probiotic interventions and evaluating outcomes related to ASD behavior symptoms. The study utilized Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 for bias assessment and applied random effect models with inverse variance method for statistical analysis, also addressing publication bias and conducting subgroup analyses through Begg's and Egger's tests to explore the effects of various factors on the outcomes. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis, which looked at eight studies with a total of 318 samples from ASD patients aged 1.5-20 years, showed that the probiotic intervention group had significantly better behavioral symptoms compared to the control group. This was shown by a pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) of -0.38 (95% CI: 0.58 to -0.18, p < 0.01). Subgroup analyses revealed significant findings across a variety of factors: studies conducted in the European region showed a notable improvement with an SMD of -0.44 (95%CI: 0.72 to -0.15); interventions lasting longer than three months exhibited a significant improvement with an SMD of -0.43 (95%CI: 0.65 to -0.21); and studies focusing on both participants under and greater than 10 years found significant benefits with an SMDs of -0.37 and -0.40, respectively (95%CI: 0.65 to -0.09, and 95%CI: 0.69 to -0.11, respectively). Moreover, both multi-strain probiotics and single-strain interventions showed an overall significant improvement with a SMD of -0.53 (95%CI: 0.85 to -0.22) and -0.28 (95%CI: 0.54 to -0.02), respectively. Also, the analysis confirmed the low likelihood of publication bias and the robustness of these findings. CONCLUSION: Our study highlighted the significant improvement in ASD behavioral symptoms through probiotic supplementation. The need for personalized treatment approaches and further research to confirm efficacy and safety of probiotics in ASD management is emphasized.
背景:最近的研究强调了肠道-大脑轴和肠道微生物群在自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)中的重要作用,ASD 是一种神经行为发育障碍,其特征是多种神经精神和胃肠道症状,这表明肠道微生物群的改变可能与 ASD 症状的严重程度相关。因此,本研究旨在对益生菌干预改善 ASD 患者行为症状的效果进行全面的系统评价和荟萃分析。
方法:本研究遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。在 Cochrane 图书馆、PubMed、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar 等多个数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,检索时间截至 2024 年 6 月。纳入标准包括已发表的随机对照试验(RCT),重点关注益生菌干预,并评估与 ASD 行为症状相关的结果。本研究使用 Cochrane 的风险偏倚 2 进行偏倚评估,并应用逆方差法的随机效应模型进行统计分析,还通过 Begg 和 Egger 检验来评估发表偏倚,并进行亚组分析,以探讨各种因素对结果的影响。
结果:我们的荟萃分析共纳入了 8 项研究,共有 318 名年龄在 1.5-20 岁的 ASD 患者,结果显示益生菌干预组的行为症状明显优于对照组。这表现在标准化均数差(SMD)为-0.38(95%置信区间:0.58 至-0.18,p<0.01)。亚组分析显示,在多种因素下都有显著的发现:在欧洲地区进行的研究显示,SMD 为-0.44(95%置信区间:0.72 至-0.15)时有明显改善;干预时间超过三个月的研究显示,SMD 为-0.43(95%置信区间:0.65 至-0.21)时有显著改善;而关注参与者年龄在 10 岁以下和 10 岁以上的研究分别显示出显著的益处,SMD 分别为-0.37 和-0.40(95%置信区间:0.65 至-0.09,和 95%置信区间:0.69 至-0.11)。此外,多菌株益生菌和单菌株干预均显示出整体显著改善,SMD 分别为-0.53(95%置信区间:0.85 至-0.22)和-0.28(95%置信区间:0.54 至-0.02)。此外,分析结果还证实了发表偏倚的可能性较低,并且这些发现是可靠的。
结论:本研究强调了通过益生菌补充来改善 ASD 行为症状的重要性。需要采用个性化的治疗方法,并进一步研究以确认益生菌在 ASD 管理中的疗效和安全性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-11-21
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-3-23
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-10-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011-11-9
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2025-7-9
Brain Behav Immun Health. 2025-6-16
Int J Mol Sci. 2024-11-19