Agrawal Sachin, Rath Chandra, Rao Shripada, Whitehouse Andrew, Patole Sanjay
Neonatal Directorate, KEM Hospital for Women, Perth, WA 6008, Australia.
Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.
Microorganisms. 2025 Feb 27;13(3):545. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13030545.
Given the significance of gut microbiota in autism spectrum disorder (ASD), we aimed to assess the quality of systematic reviews (SRs) of studies assessing gut microbiota and effects of probiotic supplementation in children with ASD. PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Medline, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to November 2024. We included SRs of randomised or non-randomized studies reporting on gut microbiota or effects of probiotics in children with ASD. A total of 48 SRs (probiotics: 21, gut microbiota: 27) were included. The median (IQR) number of studies and participants was 7 (5) and 328 (362), respectively, for SRs of probiotic intervention studies and 18 (18) and 1083 (1201), respectively, for SRs of gut microbiota studies in children with ASD. The quality of included SRs was low (probiotics: 12, gut microbiota: 14) to critically low (probiotics: 9, gut microbiota: 13) due to lack of reporting of critical items including prior registration, deviation from protocol, and risk of bias assessment of included studies. Assuring robust methodology and reporting of future studies is important for generating robust evidence in this field.
鉴于肠道微生物群在自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)中的重要性,我们旨在评估评估ASD儿童肠道微生物群及益生菌补充效果的系统评价(SR)的质量。检索了PubMed、EMBASE、PsycINFO、Medline和Cochrane数据库,检索时间从建库至2024年11月。我们纳入了报告ASD儿童肠道微生物群或益生菌效果的随机或非随机研究的SR。共纳入48篇SR(益生菌:21篇,肠道微生物群:27篇)。ASD儿童益生菌干预研究的SR中,研究数量和参与者数量的中位数(IQR)分别为7(5)和328(362),肠道微生物群研究的SR中分别为18(18)和1083(1201)。由于缺乏对关键项目的报告,包括预先注册、与方案的偏差以及纳入研究的偏倚风险评估,纳入的SR质量较低(益生菌:12篇,肠道微生物群:14篇)至极低(益生菌:9篇,肠道微生物群:13篇)。确保未来研究采用稳健的方法并进行报告,对于在该领域产生可靠证据非常重要。