École des Sciences Criminelles, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Federal Office for Civil Protection (FOCP), Spiez Laboratory, Spiez, Switzerland.
Forensic Sci Int. 2024 Nov;364:112206. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112206. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
Forensic investigations following incidents involving chemical or biological agents present considerable challenges. Understanding the possibilities and limitations can aid in determining the most suitable procedures and enhancing the recovery of useful traces in these complex situations. This work complements previously published results on the effects of decontaminants on fingermarks deposited on glass. Identifying the perpetrators can be crucial, and DNA analysis remains a cornerstone in this regard. In this study, we investigated the ability to obtain usable DNA profiles from blood and saliva (pure and diluted) exposed to 16 different decontamination methods. Both DNA quantitation and DNA profiling were considered to assess the outcomes. The results revealed considerable variability but indicated that biological agents' decontaminants hindered DNA profiling post-decontamination to a greater extent than decontaminants aimed for chemical agents. Chlorine-based decontaminants also globally had a deleterious impact on DNA profiling. Powder decontaminants such as Fast-Act, CHpowder, and the liquid decontaminants GDS2000 did not affect DNA profiling.
在涉及化学或生物制剂的事件发生后进行法医调查存在相当大的挑战。了解这些可能性和局限性有助于确定最合适的程序,并在这些复杂情况下提高有用痕迹的恢复能力。这项工作补充了先前关于消毒剂对玻璃上留下的指纹的影响的已发表结果。确定犯罪者可能是至关重要的,而 DNA 分析在这方面仍然是基石。在这项研究中,我们研究了从暴露于 16 种不同消毒方法的血液和唾液(纯和稀释)中获得可用 DNA 图谱的能力。同时考虑了 DNA 定量和 DNA 分析来评估结果。结果显示存在相当大的可变性,但表明生物制剂的消毒剂在消毒后对 DNA 分析的阻碍程度大于针对化学制剂的消毒剂。基于氯的消毒剂也对 DNA 分析产生了普遍的不利影响。粉末消毒剂,如 Fast-Act、CHpowder 和液体消毒剂 GDS2000,不会影响 DNA 分析。