Lee Hye In, Kim Jina, Kim In Ah, Lee Joo Ho, Cho Jaeho, Rahman Rifaquat, Fell Geoffrey, Wee Chan Woo, Yoon Hong In
Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Apr;57(2):378-386. doi: 10.4143/crt.2024.680. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
This study aimed to develop a graded prognostic assessment (GPA) model integrating genomic characteristics for elderly patients with glioblastoma (eGBM), and to compare the efficacy of different radiotherapy schedules.
This multi-institutional retrospective study included patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent surgical resection followed by radiotherapy with or without temozolomide (TMZ) for newly diagnosed eGBM. Based on the significant factors identified in the multivariate analysis for overall survival (OS), the molecular GPA for eGBM (eGBM-molGPA) was established.
A total of 334 and 239 patients who underwent conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) and hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) were included, respectively, with 86% of patients receiving TMZ-based chemoradiation. With a median follow-up of 17.4 months (range, 3.3 to 149.9 months), the median OS was 18.7 months for CFRT+TMZ group, 15.1 months for HFRT+TMZ group, and 10.4 months for radiotherapy alone group (CFRT+TMZ vs. HFRT+TMZ: hazard ratio [HR], 1.52; p < 0.001 and CFRT+TMZ vs. radiotherapy alone: HR, 2.52; p < 0.001). In a combined analysis with the NOA-08 and Nordic trials, CFRT+TMZ group exhibited the highest survival rates among all treatment groups. The eGBM-molGPA, which integrated four clinical and three molecular parameters, stratified patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. CFRT+TMZ significantly improved OS compared to HFRT+TMZ or radiotherapy alone in the low-risk (p=0.023) and intermediate-risk groups (p < 0.001). However, in the high-risk group, there was no significant difference in OS between treatment options (p=0.770).
CFRT+TMZ may be more effective than HFRT+TMZ or radiotherapy alone for selected eGBM patients. The novel eGBM-molGPA model can guide treatment selection for this patient population.
本研究旨在开发一种整合基因组特征的老年胶质母细胞瘤(eGBM)分级预后评估(GPA)模型,并比较不同放疗方案的疗效。
这项多机构回顾性研究纳入了年龄≥65岁、接受手术切除后接受或不接受替莫唑胺(TMZ)放疗的新诊断eGBM患者。基于多因素分析中确定的影响总生存期(OS)的显著因素,建立了eGBM的分子GPA(eGBM-molGPA)。
分别纳入了334例接受常规分割放疗(CFRT)和239例接受大分割放疗(HFRT)的患者,86%的患者接受了基于TMZ的放化疗。中位随访时间为17.4个月(范围3.3至149.9个月),CFRT+TMZ组的中位OS为18.7个月,HFRT+TMZ组为15.1个月,单纯放疗组为10.4个月(CFRT+TMZ与HFRT+TMZ比较:风险比[HR],1.52;p<0.001;CFRT+TMZ与单纯放疗比较:HR,2.52;p<0.001)。在与NOA-08和北欧试验的联合分析中,CFRT+TMZ组在所有治疗组中生存率最高。整合了四个临床和三个分子参数的eGBM-molGPA将患者分为低、中、高风险组。在低风险组(p=0.023)和中风险组(p<0.001)中,CFRT+TMZ与HFRT+TMZ或单纯放疗相比,显著改善了OS。然而,在高风险组中,不同治疗方案的OS无显著差异(p=0.770)。
对于选定的eGBM患者,CFRT+TMZ可能比HFRT+TMZ或单纯放疗更有效。新型eGBM-molGPA模型可为该患者群体的治疗选择提供指导。