Suppr超能文献

在真实腭裂有限元模型中定义术前婴儿骨科的生物力学原理。

Defining biomechanical principles in pre-surgical infant orthopedics in a real cleft finite element model.

作者信息

Winnand P, Ooms M, Heitzer M, Schaffrath K, Pankert T, Hölzle F, Raith S, Modabber A

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Oct;54(10):904-913. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2024.08.041. Epub 2024 Sep 11.

Abstract

Presurgical infant orthopedics (PSIO) is the first step in the treatment of cleft lip and palate (CLP) and is designed to approximate the cleft segments as effectively as possible before surgical reconstruction of the lip and palate. The biomechanical efficacy of different PSIO approaches in transferring molding forces to the CLP is unknown. This study aimed to define the biomechanical principles of competing PSIO techniques in a real cleft finite element (FE) model. Active intraoral (Latham), passive alveolar molding (PAM), and extraoral (DynaCleft) molding forces were virtually applied to a real cleft FE model. In the cleft region, PAM (P < 0.001) and Latham (P < 0.05) exerted significantly less stress than DynaCleft. Intraoral molding forces acted primarily at the site of the force initiation without being accompanied by high loads in the midface. PAM showed a tendency toward a better flow behavior of the molding forces than Latham. Extraoral molding transferred high stresses to the cleft, alveolar ridge, and midface. Intraoral passive molding was ultimately characterized by the highest biomechanical efficacy and showed the most favorable load distribution of all of the PSIO approaches considered in this study. Future research is needed to validate the findings against clinical data.

摘要

术前婴儿整形外科(PSIO)是唇腭裂(CLP)治疗的第一步,旨在在唇腭裂手术重建之前尽可能有效地使裂隙段接近。不同PSIO方法在将塑形力传递至CLP方面的生物力学效果尚不清楚。本研究旨在在真实的腭裂有限元(FE)模型中确定相互竞争的PSIO技术的生物力学原理。将主动口内(Latham)、被动牙槽塑形(PAM)和口外(DynaCleft)塑形力虚拟施加于真实的腭裂FE模型。在腭裂区域,PAM(P < 0.001)和Latham(P < 0.05)产生的应力明显低于DynaCleft。口内塑形力主要作用于力起始部位,而面中部无高负荷伴随。与Latham相比,PAM显示出塑形力具有更好的流动特性。口外塑形将高应力传递至腭裂、牙槽嵴和面中部。口内被动塑形最终表现出最高的生物力学效果,且在所研究的所有PSIO方法中显示出最有利的负荷分布。需要进一步的研究以根据临床数据验证这些发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验