Suppr超能文献

保乳手术后同侧乳腺导管原位癌复发的管理:数据匮乏区域。

Management of Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Following Breast Conservation Surgery for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Data-Poor Zone.

机构信息

Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Biostastistical Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Dec;31(13):8843-8847. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16133-8. Epub 2024 Sep 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Breast conserving surgery (BCS) is well established for the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), but neither randomized trials nor guidelines address management of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after BCS for DCIS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified women treated with BCS for DCIS who developed IBTR as a first event. Between those treated with mastectomy versus re-BCS, we compare the clinicopathologic characteristics, the use of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) both upfront ("primary RT") and post IBTR ("secondary RT"), of tamoxifen, the rate of third events (local, regional, distant), and both breast cancer specific (BCSS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of 3001 women treated with BCS for DCIS (1978-2010), 383 developed an IBTR as a first event (1983-2023) and were treated by mastectomy (51%) versus re-BCS (49%). Compared with re-BCS, mastectomy patients at initial treatment were higher grade (74% versus 59%, p = 0.004), with more frequent primary RT (61% versus 21%, p < 0.001). Third local events were more frequent for re-BCS than mastectomy (16% versus 3%, p = 0.001), but there were no differences in breast cancer specific or overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

For isolated IBTR following BCS for DCIS and treated by mastectomy versus re-BCS (1) mastectomy was associated with less favorable initial pathology and more frequent use of primary RT, (2) re- recurrence was more frequent with re-BCS, and (3) BCSS and OS were comparable. Our data suggest a wider role for re-BCS and further study of the relationship between secondary RT and the rate of third breast events.

摘要

背景

保乳手术(BCS)已被广泛用于治疗导管原位癌(DCIS),但随机试验和指南均未涉及 DCIS 保乳术后同侧乳房肿瘤复发(IBTR)的处理。

患者和方法

我们确定了接受保乳手术治疗 DCIS 后发生 IBTR 的患者。在接受乳房切除术与再次保乳手术治疗的患者中,我们比较了临床病理特征、辅助放疗(RT)的应用,包括初始(“原发性 RT”)和 IBTR 后(“继发性 RT”)应用,他莫昔芬的应用,第三事件(局部、区域、远处)的发生率,以及乳腺癌特异性(BCSS)和总体生存(OS)。

结果

在 3001 例接受保乳手术治疗 DCIS 的患者中(1978-2010 年),383 例首次发生 IBTR(1983-2023 年),并接受乳房切除术(51%)或再次保乳手术(49%)治疗。与再次保乳手术相比,初始治疗时乳房切除术患者的肿瘤分级更高(74%比 59%,p=0.004),且更常接受原发性 RT(61%比 21%,p<0.001)。再次保乳手术患者的第三局部事件更常见(16%比 3%,p=0.001),但乳腺癌特异性或总体生存无差异。

结论

对于保乳手术后孤立性 IBTR 并接受乳房切除术与再次保乳手术治疗的患者:(1)乳房切除术与更不利的初始病理学和更频繁的原发性 RT 相关,(2)再次复发在再次保乳手术中更常见,(3)BCSS 和 OS 相似。我们的数据表明再次保乳手术的作用更广泛,并进一步研究继发性 RT 与第三乳房事件发生率之间的关系。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验