Then James, Tawfik Samuel, Law Timothy, Brown Alastair, Carnegie Vanessa, Udy Andrew, Jeffcote Toby
Department of Intensive Care, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
The Victorian Brain and Spine Centre, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Apr;42(2):668-679. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02111-1. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is characterized by high mortality and morbidity. This scoping review assesses the current evidence regarding the use of sedatives and analgesics in the acute intensive care unit management of aSAH. We conducted a systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid EmCare, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception to June 2023. Studies were included if they enrolled intensive care unit patients aged 18 or older with a significant proportion (> 20%) who had aSAH and evaluated the impact of one or more commonly used analgosedatives on physiological parameters in the management of aSAH. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies score. Of 2,583 articles, 11 met the inclusion criteria. The median sample size was 47 (interquartile range 10-127), and the median Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies score was 9.5 (interquartile range 8-11). The studies' publication years ranged from 1980 to 2023. Dexmedetomidine and ketamine showed potential benefits in reducing the incidence of cortical spreading depolarization and delayed cerebral ischemia. Propofol and opioids appeared safe but lacked robust evidence for efficacy. Benzodiazepines were associated with increased delayed cerebral ischemia-related cerebral infarctions and cortical spreading depolarization events. The evidence available to guide the use of analgosedative medications in aSAH is critically inadequate. Dexmedetomidine and ketamine warrant further exploration in large-scale prospective studies because of their potential benefits. Improved study designs with consistent definitions and a focus on patient-centered outcomes are necessary to inform clinical practice.
动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)具有高死亡率和高发病率的特点。本综述评估了在aSAH急性重症监护病房管理中使用镇静剂和镇痛药的现有证据。我们对Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid Embase、Ovid EmCare、APA PsycInfo、CINAHL以及Cochrane系统评价数据库进行了系统检索,检索时间跨度从创建至2023年6月。纳入的研究需为纳入18岁及以上重症监护病房患者,且其中相当比例(>20%)患有aSAH,并评估一种或多种常用镇痛镇静药物对aSAH管理中生理参数的影响。使用非随机研究方法学指数评分评估研究的方法学质量。在2583篇文章中,11篇符合纳入标准。样本量中位数为47(四分位间距为10 - 127),非随机研究方法学指数评分中位数为9.5(四分位间距为8 - 11)。这些研究的发表年份从1980年至2023年。右美托咪定和氯胺酮在降低皮层扩散性去极化和延迟性脑缺血的发生率方面显示出潜在益处。丙泊酚和阿片类药物似乎是安全的,但缺乏有力的疗效证据。苯二氮䓬类药物与延迟性脑缺血相关的脑梗死和皮层扩散性去极化事件增加有关。用于指导aSAH中镇痛镇静药物使用的现有证据严重不足。由于右美托咪定和氯胺酮的潜在益处,有必要在大规模前瞻性研究中进一步探索。需要改进研究设计,采用一致的定义并关注以患者为中心的结局,以便为临床实践提供信息。