• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别在其他临床试验注册机构注册的在印度开展的试验:一项横断面研究。

Identifying trials run in India that are registered in other clinical trial registries: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Institute of Bioinformatics and Applied Biotechnology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Aganitha Cognitive Solutions, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Sep 12;24(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02336-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12874-024-02336-w
PMID:39266975
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11391788/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials play a crucial role in biomedical research, and it is important to register them in public registries to ensure transparency and prevent research waste. In this study, we wished to determine what steps need to be taken to identify every clinical trial run in India that has been registered in any of the (non-Indian) World Health Organization-recognised primary registries. Of the 16 registries, we studied all except that of the European Union, which will be studied separately.

METHODS

Two methodologies were employed for each registry, except for four that did not facilitate one or the other method. Methodology A involved downloading all the records in a registry and querying them. Methodology B involved conducting a search via the registry website.

RESULTS

Only four registries provided consistent results with both methodologies. Seven registries had different results from the two methodologies. Of these, in four cases, in Methodology A one field indicated that the study ran in India, while another indicated otherwise.

CONCLUSIONS

The above-mentioned ambiguities should be addressed by the concerned registries. Overall, this study reinforces the need for improved data accuracy and transparency in clinical trial registries and emphasizes the importance of resolving complications faced by users while navigating the registries. Ensuring accurate and comprehensive registration of clinical trials is essential for meta-research and the use of such data by a variety of stakeholders.

摘要

背景

临床试验在生物医学研究中起着至关重要的作用,将其在公共注册机构中进行注册以确保透明度并防止研究浪费非常重要。在这项研究中,我们希望确定需要采取哪些步骤来识别在印度进行的所有已在任何(非印度)世界卫生组织认可的主要注册机构中注册的临床试验。我们研究了除欧洲联盟注册机构(将单独进行研究)之外的 16 个注册机构中的所有注册机构。

方法

除了四个注册机构不允许使用一种或另一种方法外,每个注册机构都采用了两种方法。方法 A 涉及下载注册机构中的所有记录并对其进行查询。方法 B 涉及通过注册机构网站进行搜索。

结果

只有四个注册机构的两种方法提供的结果一致。七种注册机构的两种方法的结果不同。在这七种注册机构中,有四种情况在方法 A 中,一个字段表明该研究在印度进行,而另一个字段则表明并非如此。

结论

上述歧义应由有关注册机构解决。总的来说,这项研究强调了临床试验注册机构需要提高数据准确性和透明度,并强调了解决用户在浏览注册机构时遇到的并发症的重要性。确保临床试验的准确和全面注册对于元研究和各种利益相关者使用此类数据至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d07/11391788/82da8868097f/12874_2024_2336_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d07/11391788/82da8868097f/12874_2024_2336_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d07/11391788/82da8868097f/12874_2024_2336_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying trials run in India that are registered in other clinical trial registries: a cross-sectional study.识别在其他临床试验注册机构注册的在印度开展的试验:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Sep 12;24(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02336-w.
2
Three levels of discrepancies in the records of trial sites in India, registered with the European Union Clinical Trials Register.在欧盟临床试验注册处登记的印度试验地点记录中的三个差异级别。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 5;11:1357930. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1357930. eCollection 2024.
3
Hidden duplicates: 10s or 100s of Indian trials, registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, have not been registered in India, as required by law.潜在重复:数以百计的印度临床试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,但根据法律要求,这些试验并未在印度注册。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 19;15(6):e0234925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234925. eCollection 2020.
4
Trends and variation in data quality and availability on the European Union Clinical Trials Register: A cross-sectional study.欧盟临床试验注册中心数据质量和可获得性的趋势和变化:一项横断面研究。
Clin Trials. 2022 Apr;19(2):172-183. doi: 10.1177/17407745211073483. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
5
An analysis of deficiencies in the data of interventional drug trials registered with Clinical Trials Registry - India.对临床试验注册中心 - 印度登记的介入性药物试验数据缺陷的分析。
Trials. 2019 Aug 28;20(1):535. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3592-0.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Clinical Trials in Dentistry: A Cross-sectional Analysis of World Health Organization-International Clinical Trial Registry Platform.牙科临床试验:世界卫生组织-国际临床试验注册平台的横断面分析
J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2016 Jun;16(2):90-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
8
Prevalence of clinical trial status discrepancies: A cross-sectional study of 10,492 trials registered on both ClinicalTrials.gov and the European Union Clinical Trials Register.临床试验状态差异的流行率:一项在 ClinicalTrials.gov 和欧盟临床试验注册中心登记的 10492 项试验的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 7;13(3):e0193088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193088. eCollection 2018.
9
In Clinical Trials Registry-India, the classification of sponsors needs to be standardised.在临床试验注册印度,需要对赞助商的分类进行标准化。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2024 Jan-Mar;IX(1):11-18. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2023.071.
10
RReACT goes global: perils and pitfalls of constructing a global open-access database of registered analgesic clinical trials and trial results.RReACT走向全球:构建注册镇痛临床试验及试验结果全球开放获取数据库的风险与陷阱。
Pain. 2014 Jul;155(7):1313-1317. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 Apr 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Availability of results of clinical trials registered on EU Clinical Trials Register: cross sectional audit study.欧盟临床试验注册库中注册的临床试验结果的可获取性:横断面审计研究
BMJ Med. 2024 Jan 12;3(1):e000738. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2023-000738. eCollection 2024.
2
Impact of searching clinical trials registers in systematic reviews of pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions: Reanalysis of meta-analyses.药物和非药物干预措施系统评价中检索临床试验注册库的影响:荟萃分析再分析。
Res Synth Methods. 2023 Jan;14(1):52-67. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1583. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
3
CTRI requirement of prospective trial registration: Not always consistent.
CTRI 要求前瞻性试验注册:并非总是一致。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2022 Oct-Dec;VII(4):312-314. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2022.033. Epub 2022 May 13.
4
Searching clinical trials registers: guide for systematic reviewers.检索临床试验注册库:系统评价者指南
BMJ. 2022 Apr 26;377:e068791. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068791.
5
Reliability of Trial Information Across Registries for Trials With Multiple Registrations: A Systematic Review.多注册试验的注册库间试验信息的可靠性:系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2128898. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28898.
6
A comparative analysis of important public clinical trial registries, and a proposal for an interim ideal one.重要公共临床试验注册库的比较分析,及一个临时理想库的建议。
PLoS One. 2021 May 11;16(5):e0251191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251191. eCollection 2021.
7
Creating a Program to Support Registering and Reporting Clinical Trials at Johns Hopkins University.创建一个程序以支持在约翰霍普金斯大学注册和报告临床试验。
Acad Med. 2021 Apr 1;96(4):529-533. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003806.
8
Hidden duplicates: 10s or 100s of Indian trials, registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, have not been registered in India, as required by law.潜在重复:数以百计的印度临床试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,但根据法律要求,这些试验并未在印度注册。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 19;15(6):e0234925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234925. eCollection 2020.
9
An analysis of deficiencies in the data of interventional drug trials registered with Clinical Trials Registry - India.对临床试验注册中心 - 印度登记的介入性药物试验数据缺陷的分析。
Trials. 2019 Aug 28;20(1):535. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3592-0.
10
Registration audit of clinical trials given a favourable opinion by UK research ethics committees.英国研究伦理委员会给予有利意见的临床试验的注册审核。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 21;9(2):e026840. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026840.