Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Cardiol Young. 2024 Aug;34(8):1728-1731. doi: 10.1017/S1047951124000611. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
With the rise of online references, podcasts, webinars, self-test tools, and social media, it is worthwhile to understand whether textbooks continue to provide value in medical education, and to assess the capacity they serve during fellowship training.
A prospective mixed-methods study based on surveys that were disseminated to seven paediatric cardiology fellowship programmes around the world. Participants were asked to read an assigned chapter of textbook, followed by the completion of the survey. Open-ended questions included theming and grouping responses as appropriate.
The survey was completed by 36 participants. When asked about the content, organisation, and utility of the chapter, responses were generally positive, at greater than 89%. The chapters, overall, were rated relatively easy to read, scoring at 6.91, with standard deviations plus or minus 1.72, on a scale from 1 to 10, with higher values meaning better results. When asked to rank their preferences in where they obtain educational content, textbooks were ranked the second highest, with in-person teaching ranking first. Several themes were identified including the limitations of the use of textbook use, their value, and ways to enhance learning from their reading. There was also a near-unanimous desire for more time to self-learn and read during fellowship.
Textbooks are still highly valued by trainees. Many opportunities exist, nonetheless, to improve how they can be organised to deliver information optimally. Future efforts should look towards making them more accessible, and to include more resources for asynchronous learning.
随着在线参考文献、播客、网络研讨会、自我测试工具和社交媒体的兴起,了解教科书在医学教育中是否仍然具有价值,并评估它们在住院医师培训中所发挥的作用是很有意义的。
这是一项基于调查的前瞻性混合方法研究,调查对象为全球 7 个儿科心脏病学住院医师培训项目。参与者被要求阅读指定的教科书章节,然后完成调查。开放性问题包括主题和适当的分组回复。
共有 36 名参与者完成了调查。当被问及章节的内容、组织和实用性时,大多数人的回答是积极的,超过 89%。总体而言,这些章节的阅读相对容易,评分为 6.91,满分 10 分,标准差为正负 1.72,分数越高表示结果越好。当被要求在他们获取教育内容的首选方式中对教科书进行排名时,教科书排名第二,而面对面教学排名第一。确定了几个主题,包括使用教科书的局限性、它们的价值以及从阅读中增强学习的方法。几乎所有人都希望在住院医师培训期间有更多的自学和阅读时间。
教科书仍然受到学员的高度重视。尽管如此,仍有很多机会可以改进它们的组织方式,以最佳地传递信息。未来的努力应该着眼于使它们更易于访问,并为异步学习提供更多资源。