a Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center , Denver , USA.
b Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health , Aurora , USA.
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2019 Oct;57(10):842-846. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2019.1574974. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
Advances in technology have brought with them innovations in delivery of medical educational content; for example, audio and video podcasts, flipped classroom learning, and e-books. These new modalities may be useful for delivery of content asynchronously, as an adjunct to traditional lecture-based and bedside clinical teaching. Here, we measured the differences in knowledge acquisition between medical students using a video-based content delivery method and students using a traditional method of asynchronous content delivery (a textbook chapter). We also measured student preferences regarding asynchronous content delivery. A 4.5-minute educational video was created by a content expert using VideoScribe software. Acetaminophen toxicity was selected as the sample topic. Survey Monkey software was used to create a pre-test, post-test, and to gather data regarding student preferences. Students were given the pre-test, then they were randomized to either read a chapter on acetaminophen overdose from an emergency medicine reference text or to view the video; they were then given the post-test and the preferences survey. The results were then categorized and analysed using descriptive statistics and linear regression. Sixty-nine student responses were initiated, 14 of whom did not complete the full survey, leaving 55 students who were included in the final analysis. Fifteen first year, 27 second-year, 8 third-year, and 5 fourth-year students participated. Twenty-eight students were randomized to reading the textbook chapter, and 31 were randomized to view the video; 4 students in the textbook group did not finish the educational activity. On average, students who took the video training correctly answered 1.1 (95% CI: 0.1-2.2, = .03) more questions correctly after adjusting for pretest score and year in medical school than those who read the textbook chapter. A preference for watching a video over reading a textbook chapter was expressed by 78.4% of students, while 98% of students either agreed or strongly agreed with the statement that they would be comfortable using the internet to learn new concepts. No students reported that they were very satisfied and 57% of students reported being satisfied reading the textbook chapter, while 93.3% were either satisfied or very satisfied viewing the video. Video delivery of educational content was associated with higher student satisfaction and relative improvement in score compared to textbook. Students overall expressed comfort using the internet and new technology to obtain new medical education. The authors were involved with creation of the video and quiz, which may confound results. Future exploration into retention of knowledge could be warranted.
技术进步带来了医学教育内容传递方式的创新;例如,音频和视频播客、翻转课堂学习和电子书。这些新的模式可能有助于异步传递内容,作为传统的基于讲座和床边临床教学的补充。在这里,我们通过使用基于视频的内容传递方法的医学生与使用传统异步内容传递方法(教科书章节)的医学生之间的知识获取差异进行了测量。我们还测量了学生对异步内容传递的偏好。 使用 Videoscribe 软件,由内容专家创建了一个 4.5 分钟的教育视频。选择对乙酰氨基酚毒性作为示例主题。Survey Monkey 软件用于创建预测试、后测试以及收集有关学生偏好的数据。学生先进行预测试,然后随机分为阅读急诊医学参考文本中关于对乙酰氨基酚过量的章节或观看视频的两个组;然后他们进行后测试和偏好调查。然后使用描述性统计和线性回归对结果进行分类和分析。 启动了 69 名学生的响应,其中 14 名学生没有完成完整的调查,因此有 55 名学生被纳入最终分析。有 15 名一年级学生、27 名二年级学生、8 名三年级学生和 5 名四年级学生参加。28 名学生被随机分配到阅读教科书章节,31 名学生被随机分配到观看视频;在阅读章节的小组中有 4 名学生未完成教育活动。平均而言,接受视频培训的学生在调整预测试分数和医学生年级后,正确回答的问题比阅读教科书章节的学生多 1.1 个(95%CI:0.1-2.2, = .03)。78.4%的学生表示更喜欢观看视频而不是阅读教科书章节,而 98%的学生表示他们愿意或非常愿意使用互联网学习新概念。没有学生表示非常满意,而 57%的学生表示阅读教科书章节满意,而 93.3%的学生表示满意或非常满意观看视频。 与教科书相比,教育内容的视频传递与更高的学生满意度和相对分数提高相关。学生普遍表示愿意使用互联网和新技术获取新的医学教育。作者参与了视频和测验的制作,这可能会影响结果。未来有必要对知识的保留进行探索。