Keber Andrea
Department of Gender, Sexuality & Women's Studies at the University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
J Lesbian Stud. 2025;29(4):406-423. doi: 10.1080/10894160.2024.2401258. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
Naming oneself, and claiming an identity and a community, depends largely upon how people define and represent themselves, and whether that self-definition and representation is accepted by, or legible to, others who inhabit different social positions based on age, gender, sexuality, and often generation. My aim is neither to rehabilitate the lesbian past or lesbian words for identity, nor to reject the increasingly broad use of the term queer. Rather, as a Generation X lesbian, I contend that lesbian culture, identity, and community continue to have much to offer for other categories of queerness that are similarly "untidy", contested, or less well-understood by the mainstream. Approaching lesbian history, culture, and identity as dynamic and complex broadens possibilities for who might find connection and belonging in a lesbian past and a queer future. I explore an eclectic lesbian archive with an intergenerational Canadian focus that centers lesbian identity, community, and representation. My analysis supports my assertion that lesbian and queer inheritance flow multi-directionally, across and among people of varied generations and different social locations. I further posit that far from being anachronistic, lesbian, as a term for identity and culture, and as a political project, has ongoing productive potential, vitality, and agility that exceeds generational or linear understandings due to its fundamental grounding in self-definition. (Re)circulating lesbian and queer culture, therefore, functions as intergenerational wealth, community building, and cultural memory, bridging past pleasures, knowledge, and affective attachments with present and future possibilities for living.
给自己命名,并宣称一种身份和一个社群,很大程度上取决于人们如何定义和展现自己,以及这种自我定义和展现是否被基于年龄、性别、性取向,以及通常还有代际差异而处于不同社会地位的其他人所接受或理解。我的目的既不是为女同性恋的过去或用于身份认同的女同性恋词汇平反,也不是拒绝越来越广泛使用的酷儿一词。相反,作为一名X世代女同性恋者,我认为女同性恋文化、身份和社群对于其他类似“不整洁”、有争议或未被主流充分理解的酷儿类别仍有很多可提供的东西。将女同性恋历史、文化和身份视为动态且复杂的,会拓宽在女同性恋的过去和酷儿的未来中可能找到联系和归属感的人群范围。我探索了一个不拘一格的女同性恋档案库,重点关注加拿大的跨代情况,其核心是女同性恋身份、社群和呈现。我的分析支持了我的观点,即女同性恋和酷儿的传承是多方向流动的,跨越不同代际和不同社会位置的人群。我进一步提出,女同性恋作为一个用于身份和文化的术语,以及作为一个政治项目,远非不合时宜,它具有持续的生产潜力、活力和灵活性,因其基于自我定义的根本基础而超越了代际或线性的理解。因此,(重新)传播女同性恋和酷儿文化,起到了跨代财富、社群建设和文化记忆的作用,将过去的快乐、知识和情感依恋与当下及未来的生活可能性联系起来。