Sotero Filipa Dourado, Nobre João, Vicente Beatriz Nunes, Martins Isabel Pavão
Neurology Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Headache. 2025 Jan;65(1):54-60. doi: 10.1111/head.14819. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
The "interictal burden of migraine" (MIB) is a new concept that encompasses the overall impact of the disease between migraine episodes. However, the factors that contribute to this interictal burden are still unclear.
This study aimed to identify explanatory factors of interictal burden in patients with migraine.
This prospective cross-sectional observational including 200 patients with migraine (92% [n = 184] female, with a mean [standard deviation] age of 44.8 [12] years, 53% [n = 106] with chronic migraine) completed a clinical and questionnaire assessment targeting MIB, migraine impact, and depressive and cognitive complaints.
More than three-fourths (76% [n = 152]) of patients had moderate-to-severe interictal burden. Higher interictal burden (MIB Scale ≥2) was associated with higher headache frequency (eight vs. 14, p = 0.001) and intensity (headache index score 17.0 vs. 30.0, p = 0.002), higher headache impact (six-item Headache Impact Test score 59.2 vs. 63.9, p = 0.001), and more subjective memory complaints (Subjective Memory Complaints Questionnaire [SMC] score 9.0 vs. 4.5, p = 0.001), as well as anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-Anxiety score 5 vs. 10, p < 0.001) and depression symptoms (HADS-Depression score 5 vs. 8, p < 0.001). Once accounted for these potential explanatory variables, subjective memory complaints and impact of headache during ictal phase remained as individual determinants of the interictal burden, with SMC explaining 15% (odds ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.28; p = 0.010) of the interictal burden.
This finding highlights the need to consider cognitive complaints as part of the construct of interictal burden of these patients to refine the focus of their management.
“偏头痛发作间期负担”(MIB)是一个新概念,涵盖了偏头痛发作之间该疾病的总体影响。然而,导致这种发作间期负担的因素仍不清楚。
本研究旨在确定偏头痛患者发作间期负担的解释因素。
这项前瞻性横断面观察研究纳入了200例偏头痛患者(92%[n = 184]为女性,平均[标准差]年龄为44.8[12]岁,53%[n = 106]为慢性偏头痛患者),完成了一项针对MIB、偏头痛影响以及抑郁和认知主诉的临床和问卷调查评估。
超过四分之三(76%[n = 152])的患者有中度至重度的发作间期负担。较高的发作间期负担(MIB量表≥2)与较高的头痛频率(8次 vs. 14次,p = 0.001)和强度(头痛指数评分17.0 vs. 30.0,p = 0.002)、较高的头痛影响(六项头痛影响测试评分59.2 vs. 63.9,p = 0.001)、更多的主观记忆主诉(主观记忆主诉问卷[SMC]评分9.0 vs. 4.5,p = 0.001),以及焦虑(医院焦虑抑郁量表[HADS]-焦虑评分5 vs. 10,p < 0.001)和抑郁症状(HADS-抑郁评分5 vs. 8,p < 0.001)相关。一旦考虑了这些潜在的解释变量,主观记忆主诉和发作期头痛影响仍然是发作间期负担的个体决定因素,SMC解释了发作间期负担的15%(比值比1.15,95%置信区间1.03 - 1.28;p = 0.010)。
这一发现强调了需要将认知主诉视为这些患者发作间期负担构成的一部分,以优化其管理重点。