Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WVa.
Department of Mechanical, Materials and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WVa.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2024 Dec;166(6):561-571. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.07.018. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
This study aimed to use a finite element method to assess the stress on the miniscrews, skeletal and dental changes resulting from maxillary expansion using either a tooth-bone-borne (TBB) or a bone-borne (BB) device on patients with various skeletal maturation.
Two types of expanders were modeled using SolidWorks. The design of the 2 expanders was similar, with the exception that the BB appliance lacked support for teeth (rods and bands). Both were placed on the palatal bones with the help of 4 miniscrews as bony anchorage. Five skeletal maturation stages were examined using suture maturation classification by Angelieri. A lateral displacement of 0.2 mm was applied to simulate 1 turn of jackscrew per day. The dental and skeletal changes from the treatment were quantified.
Stage A sutural maturation exhibited the greatest skeletal movement (0.13 mm/d) with a V-shaped displacement pattern. Stages B and C exhibited a more parallel expansion pattern. Stages D and E exhibited the least amount of skeletal movement with either device. Compared with the BB device, TBB demonstrated greater dental displacement. On average, the BB device exhibited a skeletal-to-dental expansion ratio of 70% from stage A to C compared with 49% with the TBB device.
BB device showed more skeletal displacement than TBB, and the latter showed more dental side effects, particularly during stages B and C. The miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion appliance was effective with sutural maturation stages A to C using the classification by Angelieri with a more parallel separation of the midpalatal sutures in stages B and C.
本研究旨在使用有限元法评估在不同骨骼成熟度的患者中,使用牙骨支抗(TBB)或骨支抗(BB)装置进行上颌扩展时,微型螺钉的受力、骨骼和牙齿的变化。
使用 SolidWorks 对两种类型的扩弓器进行建模。两种扩弓器的设计相似,不同之处在于 BB 矫治器缺乏对牙齿(杆和带)的支持。两者均在 4 颗微型螺钉的帮助下放置在腭骨上,作为骨性锚固。使用 Angelieri 的缝融合成熟分类法检查了 5 个骨骼成熟阶段。通过每天施加 0.2mm 的侧向位移来模拟 1 圈螺旋扩弓器的作用。量化治疗引起的牙齿和骨骼变化。
A 期缝融合成熟表现出最大的骨骼运动(0.13mm/d),呈 V 形移位模式。B 期和 C 期表现出更平行的扩展模式。D 期和 E 期两种装置的骨骼运动最小。与 BB 装置相比,TBB 引起更大的牙齿移位。平均而言,BB 装置在 A 期到 C 期的骨骼到牙齿扩展比为 70%,而 TBB 装置为 49%。
BB 装置显示出比 TBB 更多的骨骼移位,后者显示出更多的牙齿副作用,特别是在 B 期和 C 期。使用 Angelieri 分类,微型螺钉辅助快速腭扩张矫治器在 A 期到 C 期的缝融合成熟阶段有效,B 期和 C 期的中缝更加平行分离。