Suppr超能文献

新诊断局灶性癫痫成人中常用抗癫痫药物的不良反应。

The Adverse Effects of Commonly Prescribed Antiseizure Medications in Adults With Newly Diagnosed Focal Epilepsy.

机构信息

From the Department of Neuroscience (S.N.B., Z.C., P.P.), Central Clinical School, and Clinical Epidemiology (Z.C.), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University; Department of Neurology (S.N.B., Z.C., P.P.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Neurology (S.N.B., J.F.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York; Department of Neurology (A.M.K.), University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, FL; Department of Neurology (M.G.H.), Westchester Medical Center Health, Valhalla, NY; Mid-Atlantic Epilepsy and Sleep Center (P.K.), Bethesda, MD; Department of Neurology (P.K.), The George Washington University, DC; Department of Neurology (B.W.A.-K.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; School of Pharmacy (B.E.G.), University of Wisconsin, Madison; Department of Neurology (P.P.), The Royal Melbourne Hospital; Department of Medicine (P.P.), Austin Health, The University of Melbourne; and Bladin-Berkovic Comprehensive Epilepsy Program (P.P.), Department of Neurology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia.

出版信息

Neurology. 2024 Oct 8;103(7):e209821. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209821. Epub 2024 Sep 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Systematic screening can help identify antiseizure medication (ASM)-associated adverse events (AEs) that may preclude patients from reaching effective doses or completing adequate trial periods. The Adverse Event Profile (AEP) is a self-completed instrument to identify the frequency of common AEs associated with ASM use. This study aimed to compare the AE profile of commonly used ASMs in adults with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy.

METHODS

The Human Epilepsy Project is a prospective, international, observational study investigating markers of treatment response in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. Participants were enrolled within 4 months of treatment initiation. Adult participants on levetiracetam, lamotrigine, carbamazepine, or oxcarbazepine monotherapy who completed the AEP and Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview at enrollment were included. Multivariable generalized linear and penalized logistic regression models assessed differences in total and itemized marginal AEP scores and dichotomized responses ("never/rarely" vs "sometimes/always").

RESULTS

A total of 225 adults initiated on levetiracetam (n = 132, 59%), lamotrigine (n = 55, 24%), carbamazepine (n = 19, 8.4%), or oxcarbazepine (n = 19, 8.4%) were included. There were no significant differences in AEP total scores between ASMs. Patients with depression (adjusted marginal score ratio [aMSR] 1.23, 95% CI 1.09-1.39, = 0.001) and anxiety (aMSR 1.15, 95% CI 1.04-1.26, = 0.007) had worse AEP total scores than those without. After adjusting for depression and anxiety, levetiracetam users were >3 times more likely to report feelings of aggression (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.38, 95% CI 1.07-10.7, = 0.038) and almost half as likely to experience unsteadiness (aOR 0.45, 95% CI 0.21-0.99, = 0.047) than lamotrigine users. Carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine had the highest rates of discontinuation (42.1%, each), followed by levetiracetam (34.8%) and lamotrigine (16.4%). Levetiracetam users had the highest proportion of discontinuations because of AEs alone (18%), and lamotrigine had the lowest (5%).

DISCUSSION

Systematic screening for AEs in adults with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy on ASM monotherapy showed that those with comorbid psychiatric conditions report greater AEs overall, irrespective of ASM. Levetiracetam was associated with >3-fold risk of psychiatric AEs and half the risk of experiencing unsteadiness than lamotrigine. Levetiracetam had the highest proportion of discontinuations because of AEs alone, while lamotrigine had the lowest.

摘要

背景与目的

系统筛查有助于发现与抗癫痫药物(ASM)相关的不良事件(AE),这些事件可能会使患者无法达到有效剂量或完成足够的试验期。不良事件概况(AEP)是一种自我完成的工具,用于识别与 ASM 使用相关的常见 AE 的频率。本研究旨在比较新诊断局灶性癫痫成人中常用 ASM 的 AE 特征。

方法

人类癫痫项目是一项前瞻性、国际性、观察性研究,旨在研究新诊断局灶性癫痫患者的治疗反应标志物。参与者在开始治疗后 4 个月内入组。在入组时完成 AEP 和 Mini 国际神经精神访谈的接受左乙拉西坦、拉莫三嗪、卡马西平或奥卡西平单药治疗的成年参与者被纳入研究。多变量广义线性和惩罚逻辑回归模型评估了总 AEP 评分和分项边际 AEP 评分以及二分法反应(“从未/很少”与“有时/总是”)的差异。

结果

共有 225 名新诊断为局灶性癫痫的成人开始使用左乙拉西坦(n=132,59%)、拉莫三嗪(n=55,24%)、卡马西平(n=19,8.4%)或奥卡西平(n=19,8.4%)。ASM 之间的 AEP 总分无显著差异。有抑郁(调整边际评分比[aMSR]1.23,95%CI 1.09-1.39, =0.001)和焦虑(aMSR 1.15,95%CI 1.04-1.26, =0.007)的患者的 AEP 总分更差。在调整抑郁和焦虑后,使用左乙拉西坦的患者报告有攻击性感觉的可能性高出 3 倍(调整优势比[aOR]3.38,95%CI 1.07-10.7, =0.038),而感到不稳定的可能性低一半(aOR 0.45,95%CI 0.21-0.99, =0.047),比拉莫三嗪使用者。卡马西平和奥卡西平的停药率最高(各 42.1%),其次是左乙拉西坦(34.8%)和拉莫三嗪(16.4%)。左乙拉西坦使用者因 AE 单独停药的比例最高(18%),拉莫三嗪最低(5%)。

讨论

对新诊断为局灶性癫痫的成人进行 ASM 单药治疗的 AE 系统筛查显示,无论 ASM 如何,合并精神疾病的患者总体上报告的 AE 更多。左乙拉西坦与精神病相关 AE 的风险增加 3 倍以上,而出现不稳定的风险则减半,与拉莫三嗪相比。左乙拉西坦因 AE 单独停药的比例最高,而拉莫三嗪的比例最低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验