• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交焦虑障碍中的约会:一项日记研究。

Dating in social anxiety disorder: A daily diary study.

机构信息

School of Psychological Sciences, University of Haifa, Israel.

School of Psychological Sciences, University of Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

J Anxiety Disord. 2024 Oct;107:102927. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102927. Epub 2024 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102927
PMID:39270372
Abstract

Romantic relationships are vital for health, well-being and quality of life, and an increasing percentage of romantic relations begin via use of dating apps and subsequently progress to dates. In the present study we examined dating application use and dates among individuals with SAD (n = 54) and without SAD (n = 54). Our sample included young adults (age range 18 to 33) who were not in a romantic relationship at the time of the study. For both individuals with SAD and without SAD, half of the participants were men, and half were women. We used a daily diary measurement in which participants reported on their dating application use and dates, as well as on concomitant emotions and perceptions for 21 consecutive days. We found that individuals with and without SAD did not differ in the frequency/duration of application use nor in the number of dates attended. However, individuals with SAD experienced dates as more negative compared to individuals without SAD (Cohen's d = 0.65). Interestingly, individuals with SAD did not significantly differ in their experience of dates as positive compared to individuals without SAD. Moreover, use of dating applications/going on dates were associated with increases in shame (Cohen's d = 0.59) and embarrassment (Cohen's d = 0.45) and this was found to a greater extent among individuals with SAD compared to individuals without SAD (Cohen's d = 0.50, 0.39 for shame and embarrassment respectively). Findings are discussed in the context of cognitive behavioral models of SAD and implications for treatment are considered.

摘要

浪漫关系对健康、幸福和生活质量至关重要,越来越多的浪漫关系是通过使用约会应用程序开始的,随后发展为约会。在本研究中,我们调查了社交焦虑障碍患者(n=54)和无社交焦虑障碍患者(n=54)使用约会应用程序和约会的情况。我们的样本包括在研究时没有处于恋爱关系的年轻成年人(年龄在 18 至 33 岁之间)。对于有社交焦虑障碍和无社交焦虑障碍的个体,参与者中有一半是男性,一半是女性。我们使用了一种日常日记测量方法,参与者在 21 天的连续时间内报告他们使用约会应用程序和约会的情况,以及伴随的情绪和感知。我们发现,有社交焦虑障碍和无社交焦虑障碍的个体在应用程序使用的频率/持续时间以及参加的约会次数上没有差异。然而,有社交焦虑障碍的个体认为约会比没有社交焦虑障碍的个体更消极(Cohen's d = 0.65)。有趣的是,有社交焦虑障碍的个体在体验约会的积极方面与没有社交焦虑障碍的个体没有显著差异。此外,使用约会应用程序/约会与羞耻感(Cohen's d = 0.59)和尴尬感(Cohen's d = 0.45)的增加有关,而且这种情况在有社交焦虑障碍的个体中比在没有社交焦虑障碍的个体中更为明显(羞耻感和尴尬感分别为 Cohen's d = 0.50,0.39)。研究结果在社交焦虑障碍的认知行为模型背景下进行了讨论,并考虑了治疗的意义。

相似文献

1
Dating in social anxiety disorder: A daily diary study.社交焦虑障碍中的约会:一项日记研究。
J Anxiety Disord. 2024 Oct;107:102927. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102927. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
2
Social anxiety, submissiveness, and shame in men and women: a moderated mediation analysis.男性和女性的社交焦虑、顺从性及羞耻感:一项有调节的中介分析
Br J Clin Psychol. 2015 Mar;54(1):1-15. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12057. Epub 2014 May 28.
3
Safety behaviors and positive emotions in social anxiety disorder.社交焦虑障碍中的安全行为和积极情绪。
J Anxiety Disord. 2024 Oct;107:102915. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102915. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
4
Shame and guilt in social anxiety disorder: effects of cognitive behavior therapy and association with social anxiety and depressive symptoms.社交焦虑障碍中的羞耻感和内疚感:认知行为疗法的影响及其与社交焦虑和抑郁症状的关系。
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 19;8(4):e61713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061713. Print 2013.
5
Emotions in social anxiety disorder: A review.社交焦虑障碍中的情绪:综述。
J Anxiety Disord. 2023 Apr;95:102696. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102696. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
6
Social Anxiety Disorder and Perceived Criticism in Intimate Relationships: Comparisons With Normal and Clinical Control Groups.社交焦虑障碍与亲密关系中的感知批评:与正常和临床对照组的比较。
Behav Ther. 2019 Jan;50(1):241-253. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
7
How real do you feel? Self- and partner-authenticity in social anxiety disorder.你感觉有多真实?社交焦虑障碍中的自我和伴侣真实性。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2021 Feb;130(2):166-176. doi: 10.1037/abn0000622. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
8
Responses to perceived intimate partner rejection among individuals with social anxiety disorder and healthy controls.社交焦虑障碍个体与健康对照者对感知到的亲密伴侣拒绝的反应。
J Anxiety Disord. 2020 Oct;75:102281. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102281. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
9
The behavioral economics of social anxiety disorder reveal a robust effect for interpersonal traits.社交焦虑障碍的行为经济学揭示了人际特质的强大影响。
Behav Res Ther. 2017 Aug;95:139-147. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
10
The grass is always greener: Envy in social anxiety disorder.这草总是更绿:社交焦虑障碍中的嫉妒。
J Anxiety Disord. 2021 Aug;82:102445. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102445. Epub 2021 Jul 9.