Seas Andreas, Qiu Liming, Paradie Emma, Hughes Jasmine, Warman Pranav I, Waguia-Kouam Romaric, Shlobin Nathan A, Carpenter Kennedy, von Isenburg Megan, Haglund Michael M, Fuller Anthony T, Ukachukwu Alvan-Emeka K
Duke Global Neurosurgery and Neurology, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Duke Global Neurosurgery and Neurology, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
World Neurosurg. 2024 Dec;192:e90-e108. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.029. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
There are critical disparities in the neurosurgical care provided around the globe due to challenges in resource allocation, training, and infrastructure. Global neurosurgical collaborations have replaced classical mission trips to address these disparities. However, the development of these collaborations and the impact of research funding on their growth have not yet been systematically studied. In this article, we use a graph theoretical approach to investigate trends in funding and co-authorship between and among authors from high-income countries (HICs) and authors from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
A bibliometric search of the global neurosurgical literature returned 307 articles between 1985 and 2020. A connectivity analysis was conducted to compute the number of co-authorships between HIC-HIC, LMIC-HIC, and LMIC-LMIC authors. The number of connections, summarized as either a global sum of connections or an average number of connections per manuscript, were analyzed in the context of time and funding through parametric statistical tests.
An exponential increase in co-authorship collaboration was observed over time, especially after 2015. Notably, LMIC-LMIC collaborations appear to be rising at over twice the rate of other collaboration types. The presence of funding, in general, was associated with increased co-authorship of manuscripts by LMIC and HIC authors together (P = 0.033). A significant majority of the funding associated with LMIC-HIC co-authorships was supplied through charitable organizations and government grants (P = 0.034, P = 0.009, respectively). Most LMIC-LMIC co-authorships had no funding.
This work shows significant and rapid growth in international neurosurgical partnerships, especially in HIC-LMIC and LMIC-LMIC collaborations. Also, a significant positive relationship exists between research funding and LMIC-HIC co-authorship trends. This work encourages us as a community to continue to expand our translational collaborations with LMIC neurosurgeons and establish funding mechanisms independent of HIC authors.
由于资源分配、培训和基础设施方面的挑战,全球神经外科护理存在严重差异。全球神经外科合作已取代传统的医疗援助之旅来解决这些差异。然而,这些合作的发展以及研究资金对其增长的影响尚未得到系统研究。在本文中,我们使用图论方法来研究高收入国家(HICs)和低收入及中等收入国家(LMICs)作者之间以及作者群体内部的资金和共同署名趋势。
对全球神经外科文献进行文献计量检索,在1985年至2020年间共检索到307篇文章。进行连通性分析以计算HIC-HIC、LMIC-HIC和LMIC-LMIC作者之间的共同署名数量。通过参数统计检验,在时间和资金背景下分析连接数量,以全球连接总和或每份稿件平均连接数量的形式进行总结。
随着时间的推移,共同署名合作呈指数增长,特别是在2015年之后。值得注意的是,LMIC-LMIC合作的增长速度似乎是其他合作类型的两倍多。总体而言,资金的存在与LMIC和HIC作者共同增加稿件的共同署名有关(P = 0.033)。与LMIC-HIC共同署名相关的资金绝大多数是通过慈善组织和政府拨款提供的(分别为P = 0.034,P = 0.009)。大多数LMIC-LMIC共同署名没有资金支持。
这项研究表明国际神经外科伙伴关系有显著且快速的增长,特别是在HIC-LMIC和LMIC-LMIC合作方面。此外,研究资金与LMIC-HIC共同署名趋势之间存在显著的正相关关系。这项工作鼓励我们作为一个群体继续扩大与LMIC神经外科医生的转化合作,并建立独立于HIC作者的资金机制。