Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Lakeside 7, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):6105-6110. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11229-4. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
Although per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has shown to be beneficial for the treatment of achalasia, it can be difficult to predict who will have a robust and long-lasting response. Historically, it has been shown that higher lower esophageal sphincter pressures have been associated with poorer responses to alternative endoscopic therapies such as Botox therapy and pneumatic dilation. This study was designed to evaluate if modern preoperative manometric data could similarly predict response to therapy after POEM.
This was a retrospective study of 237 patients who underwent POEM at a single institution over a period of 13 years (2011-2023) and who had a high-resolution manometry performed preoperatively and an Eckardt symptom score performed both preoperative and postoperatively. The achalasia type and integrated relaxation pressures (IRP) were tested for potential correlation with the need for any further achalasia interventions postoperatively as well as the degree of Eckardt score reduction using a linear regression model.
The Achalasia type on preoperative manometry was not predictive for further interventions or degree of Eckardt score reduction (p = 0.76 and 0.43, respectively). A higher IRP was not predictive of the need for further interventions, however, it was predictive of a greater reduction in postoperative Eckardt scores (p = 0.03) as shown by the non-zero regression slope.
In this study, achalasia type was not a predictive factor in the need for further interventions or the degree of symptom relief. Although IRP was not predictive of the need for further interventions, a higher IRP did predict better symptomatic relief postoperatively. This result is opposite that of other endoscopic treatment modalities (Botox and pneumatic dilation). Therefore, patients with higher IRP on preoperative high-resolution manometry would likely benefit from POEM which provides significant symptomatic relief postoperatively.
尽管经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)已被证明对贲门失弛缓症的治疗有益,但很难预测哪些患者会有明显且持久的疗效。既往研究显示,食管下括约肌压力较高与其他内镜治疗(如肉毒杆菌毒素治疗和气囊扩张)的反应较差相关。本研究旨在评估现代术前测压数据是否也能类似地预测 POEM 治疗后的反应。
这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了在单家机构接受 POEM 治疗的 237 例患者,这些患者的治疗时间为 13 年(2011-2023 年),且术前均行高分辨率测压和 Eckardt 症状评分,术后再次行该评分。通过线性回归模型,检测贲门失弛缓症类型和整体松弛压(IRP)与术后是否需要进一步干预以及 Eckardt 评分降低程度之间的相关性。
术前测压的贲门失弛缓症类型与进一步干预或 Eckardt 评分降低程度无关(p=0.76 和 0.43)。较高的 IRP 并不能预测是否需要进一步干预,但与术后 Eckardt 评分的显著降低相关(p=0.03),表现为非零回归斜率。
在本研究中,贲门失弛缓症类型不是进一步干预或症状缓解程度的预测因素。尽管 IRP 与进一步干预的需求无关,但较高的 IRP 确实预示着术后症状缓解更好。这一结果与其他内镜治疗方式(肉毒杆菌毒素和气囊扩张)相反。因此,术前高分辨率测压中 IRP 较高的患者可能会从 POEM 中受益,POEM 术后可显著缓解症状。