文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

经口内镜肌切开术与气囊扩张治疗腹腔镜 Heller 肌切开术后持续性或复发性贲门失弛缓症患者的疗效:一项随机临床试验。

The Efficacy of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy vs Pneumatic Dilation as Treatment for Patients With Achalasia Suffering From Persistent or Recurrent Symptoms After Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Gastroenterology. 2023 Jun;164(7):1108-1118.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.02.048. Epub 2023 Mar 11.


DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2023.02.048
PMID:36907524
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: For patients with achalasia experiencing persistent or recurrent symptoms after laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM), pneumatic dilation (PD) is the most frequently used treatment. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is increasingly being investigated as rescue therapy. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of POEM vs PD for patients with persistent or recurrent symptoms after LHM. METHODS: This randomized multicenter controlled trial included patients after LHM with an Eckardt score >3 and substantial stasis (≥2 cm) on timed barium esophagogram and randomized to POEM or PD. The primary outcome was treatment success, defined as an Eckardt score of ≤3 and without unscheduled re-treatment. Secondary outcomes included the presence of reflux esophagitis, high-resolution manometry, and timed barium esophagogram findings. Follow-up duration was 1 year after initial treatment. RESULTS: Ninety patients were included. POEM had a higher success rate (28 of 45 patients [62.2%]) than PD (12 of 45 patients [26.7%]; absolute difference, 35.6%; 95% CI, 16.4%-54.7%; P = .001; odds ratio, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.09-0.54; relative risk for success, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.37-3.99). Reflux esophagitis was not significantly different between POEM (12 of 35 [34.3%]) and PD (6 of 40 [15%]). Basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP-4) were significantly lower in the POEM group (P = .034; P = .002). Barium column height after 2 and 5 minutes was significantly less in patients treated with POEM (P = .005; P = .015). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with achalasia experiencing persistent or recurrent symptoms after LHM, POEM resulted in a significantly higher success rate than PD, with a numerically higher incidence of grade A-B reflux esophagitis. NETHERLANDS TRIAL REGISTRY: NL4361 (NTR4501), https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID = NTR4501.

摘要

背景与目的:对于腹腔镜 Heller 肌切开术(LHM)后持续或复发症状的贲门失弛缓症患者,气动扩张(PD)是最常用的治疗方法。经口内镜肌切开术(POEM)作为抢救治疗的应用越来越多。本研究旨在确定 POEM 与 PD 治疗 LHM 后持续或复发症状患者的疗效。

方法:这是一项多中心随机对照试验,纳入了 LHM 后 Eckardt 评分>3 分且食管钡餐造影显示有明显淤滞(≥2cm)的患者,并随机分为 POEM 组或 PD 组。主要结局是治疗成功,定义为 Eckardt 评分≤3 分且无需计划外再次治疗。次要结局包括反流性食管炎、高分辨率测压和食管钡餐造影结果。随访时间为初始治疗后 1 年。

结果:共纳入 90 例患者。POEM 组的成功率(45 例患者中的 28 例[62.2%])高于 PD 组(45 例患者中的 12 例[26.7%];绝对差异,35.6%;95%CI,16.4%-54.7%;P=.001;比值比,0.22;95%CI,0.09-0.54;成功的相对风险,2.33;95%CI,1.37-3.99)。POEM 组(35 例中的 12 例[34.3%])与 PD 组(40 例中的 6 例[15%])之间的反流性食管炎发生率无显著差异。POEM 组的基础食管下括约肌压力和整合松弛压力(IRP-4)显著低于 PD 组(P=.034;P=.002)。POEM 组治疗后 2 分钟和 5 分钟时的钡柱高度显著较低(P=.005;P=.015)。

结论:在 LHM 后持续或复发症状的贲门失弛缓症患者中,POEM 的成功率显著高于 PD,且 A-B 级反流性食管炎的发生率较高。

荷兰临床试验注册处:NL4361(NTR4501),https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NTR4501。

相似文献

[1]
The Efficacy of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy vs Pneumatic Dilation as Treatment for Patients With Achalasia Suffering From Persistent or Recurrent Symptoms After Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Gastroenterology. 2023-6

[2]
Effect of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy vs Pneumatic Dilation on Symptom Severity and Treatment Outcomes Among Treatment-Naive Patients With Achalasia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA. 2019-7-9

[3]
Is peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) more effective than pneumatic dilation and Heller myotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Surg Endosc. 2021-5

[4]
Efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy vs other achalasia treatments in improving esophageal function.

World J Gastroenterol. 2016-5-28

[5]
Endoscopic or Surgical Myotomy in Patients with Idiopathic Achalasia.

N Engl J Med. 2019-12-5

[6]
Peroral endoscopic myotomy laparoscopic myotomy and partial fundoplication for esophageal achalasia: A single-center randomized controlled trial.

World J Gastroenterol. 2022-9-7

[7]
Peroral endoscopic myotomy leads to higher rates of abnormal esophageal acid exposure than laparoscopic Heller myotomy in achalasia.

Surg Endosc. 2018-10-19

[8]
Peroral endoscopic myotomy is highly effective for achalasia patients with recurrent symptoms after pneumatic dilatation.

Surg Endosc. 2021-6

[9]
Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy, Pneumatic Dilatation, and Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Esophageal Achalasia.

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020-2

[10]
10-year follow-up results of the European Achalasia Trial: a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing pneumatic dilation with laparoscopic Heller myotomy.

Gut. 2024-3-7

引用本文的文献

[1]
Validation of the Japanese version of the Esophageal Hypervigilance and Anxiety Scale for esophageal symptoms.

J Gastroenterol. 2025-3

[2]
Comparative Effectiveness of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) Versus Traditional Treatment Modalities for Achalasia: A Systematic Review.

Cureus. 2024-10-20

[3]
Standard peroral endoscopic myotomy combined with open peroral endoscopic myotomy for refractory sigmoid-type achalasia.

Endoscopy. 2024-12

[4]
Elevated preoperative lower esophageal sphincter pressure predicts improved clinical outcomes after per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

Surg Endosc. 2024-10

[5]
Long-term outcomes of treatment for achalasia: Laparoscopic Heller myotomy versus POEM.

Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2024-4-20

[6]
Esophageal Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (E-POEM): Future Directions and Perspectives.

Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2024-10

[7]
Precision Endoscopy in Peroral Myotomies for Motility Disorders of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract: Current Insights and Prospective Avenues-A Comprehensive Review.

Life (Basel). 2023-10-31

[8]
[Interventional endoscopy in gastroenterology].

Inn Med (Heidelb). 2023-8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索