Jeong Yoojin, Kwak Han Sub, Lim Manyoel, Kim Young Jun, Lee Youngseung
Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Republic of Korea.
Food Processing Research Group, Korea Food Research Institute, Wanju-gun 55465, Republic of Korea.
Foods. 2024 Sep 8;13(17):2853. doi: 10.3390/foods13172853.
Preference mapping (PM), which integrates consumer and descriptive analysis (DA) data to identify attributes that drive consumer liking, is widely employed for product optimization. However, a limited group of trained panelists cannot fully represent the diverse consumer population or reliably predict market acceptance. Consequently, numerous studies have explored consumer-based methodologies as potential replacements for DA; however, their efficacy for product optimization remains limited. Therefore, this study was conducted to explore the potential of optimizing products using two consumer-based profiling techniques as alternatives to DA in external preference mapping (EPM). Overall, 8 trained panelists profiled 12 sensory attributes of 7 commercial apple juices, whereas 160 consumers assessed the same attributes using a 5-point rate-all-that-apply (RATA) scale and a 10 cm intensity scale (IS). Danzart's response surface ideal modeling was employed to identify optimal products using DA, RATA, and IS through barycenter calculations, focusing on three products from the original consumer test located around the group ideal point. Overall, the ideal products of the group and their sensory characteristics were successfully identified using DA, RATA, and IS. Regarding sensory intensities, high concordance was observed between DA and RATA (Rv = 0.92) and between DA and IS (Rv = 0.91). Overall liking and preference scores for products mixed at the optimal ratio for each method showed no significant differences in preference among the ideal products identified using DA, RATA, and IS. This study suggests that both RATA and IS are viable alternatives to DA in EPM for identifying ideal sensory profiles.
偏好映射(PM)将消费者和描述性分析(DA)数据相结合,以识别驱动消费者喜好的属性,广泛用于产品优化。然而,一小群经过训练的评判员无法完全代表多样化的消费者群体,也无法可靠地预测市场接受度。因此,许多研究探索了基于消费者的方法作为DA的潜在替代方法;然而,它们在产品优化方面的效果仍然有限。因此,本研究旨在探索在外部偏好映射(EPM)中使用两种基于消费者的剖析技术作为DA的替代方法来优化产品的潜力。总体而言,8名经过训练的评判员对7种市售苹果汁的12种感官属性进行了剖析,而160名消费者使用5点适用率(RATA)量表和10厘米强度量表(IS)对相同属性进行了评估。通过重心计算,采用Danzart的响应面理想建模,使用DA、RATA和IS来识别最佳产品,重点关注原始消费者测试中位于群体理想点附近的三种产品。总体而言,使用DA、RATA和IS成功识别了群体的理想产品及其感官特征。关于感官强度,在DA和RATA之间(Rv = 0.92)以及DA和IS之间(Rv = 0.91)观察到高度一致性。对于每种方法以最佳比例混合的产品的总体喜好和偏好得分,在使用DA、RATA和IS识别的理想产品之间的偏好上没有显著差异。本研究表明,在EPM中,RATA和IS都是识别理想感官特征的DA的可行替代方法。