Al-Nozha Omar M, Mogharbel Ghazi H, Badawi Ahmad S, Alawfi Abdulaziz K, Aljayyar Mohammed W, Makhdoom Osamah N, Kateb Husain M, Sayed Anwar A
Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taibah University, Madinah 423535, Saudi Arabia.
College of Medicine, Taibah University, Madinah 423535, Saudi Arabia.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 26;12(17):1708. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12171708.
Diabetes is a chronic condition that may become dangerous if there is insufficient insulin to help the body function properly. The proper care for diabetes depends on how well patients observe guidelines and prescriptions; consequently, patient education is critical. Poor learning may cause bad treatment and complications or other problems related to the disease.
This study aims to evaluate patients' knowledge of diabetes, assigning a knowledge (K) score out of 100, and investigate the possible impact of educating patients, through general means or via healthcare professionals, on patient knowledge of diabetes control demonstrated in the absence/presence of diabetic complications.
This multi-center interview-based cross-sectional study used a questionnaire in Madinah, Saudi Arabia. This study was conducted on adults with diabetes who were aged 15-80. We used the Michigan Diabetic Knowledge Test (MDKT) to assess the knowledge of patients with diabetes.
This study included 364 participants. The gender distribution was 48.33% male and 51.67% female. Most of them had type 2 diabetes (T2DM) without insulin (48.63%), followed by those with T2DM on insulin (36.26%), and patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) (15.11%). Patients with T2DM had significantly higher K scores than patients with type 1. Additionally, T2DM non-insulin patients' k-scores significantly exceeded those with T1DM. General and healthcare education both helped increase patients' K-scores. Mostly, patients with diabetes without any complications had significantly higher knowledge compared to those having them. Lastly, regardless of whether the education was delivered by general or professional means, the effect on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels was not significant.
Our study revealed that patients with T2DM exhibited higher knowledge than patients with T1DM. Furthermore, receiving education, whether by a healthcare professional or by general means, improved the knowledge levels of patients with T2DM but not patients with T1DM. Regarding diabetes complications, it was found that those with a higher level of knowledge had fewer complications. However, no evidence receiving education influenced the levels of HbA1C, neither in patients with T1DM nor T2DM.
糖尿病是一种慢性疾病,如果没有足够的胰岛素来帮助身体正常运作,可能会变得危险。糖尿病的恰当护理取决于患者对指南和处方的遵守程度;因此,患者教育至关重要。学习不佳可能导致治疗效果不佳、并发症或与该疾病相关的其他问题。
本研究旨在评估患者对糖尿病的了解程度,给出一个满分100分的知识(K)评分,并调查通过一般方式或通过医护人员对患者进行教育,对有无糖尿病并发症情况下患者糖尿病控制知识的可能影响。
这项基于访谈的多中心横断面研究在沙特阿拉伯麦地那使用了一份问卷。该研究针对年龄在15 - 80岁的成年糖尿病患者进行。我们使用密歇根糖尿病知识测试(MDKT)来评估糖尿病患者的知识水平。
本研究纳入了364名参与者。性别分布为男性48.33%,女性51.67%。他们中大多数患有2型糖尿病(T2DM)且未使用胰岛素(48.63%),其次是使用胰岛素的T2DM患者(36.26%),以及1型糖尿病(T1DM)患者(15.11%)。T2DM患者的K评分显著高于1型糖尿病患者。此外,T2DM非胰岛素治疗患者的K评分显著高于T1DM患者。一般教育和医护教育都有助于提高患者的K评分。大多数情况下,没有任何并发症的糖尿病患者比有并发症的患者知识水平显著更高。最后,无论教育是通过一般方式还是专业方式进行,对糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)水平的影响都不显著。
我们的研究表明,T2DM患者比T1DM患者表现出更高的知识水平。此外,接受教育,无论是由医护人员还是通过一般方式,都提高了T2DM患者的知识水平,但没有提高T1DM患者的知识水平。关于糖尿病并发症,发现知识水平较高的患者并发症较少。然而,没有证据表明接受教育会影响T1DM和T2DM患者的HbA1C水平。