Geladari Eleni, Alexopoulos Theodoros, Vasilieva Larisa, Tenta Roxane, Mani Iliana, Sevastianos Vassilios, Alexopoulou Alexandra
3rd Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Outpatient Clinic, Evangelismos General Hospital, 10676 Athens, Greece.
Gastroenterology Department, Medical School, Laiko General Hospital, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 30;13(17):5169. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175169.
: Physical frailty (PF) is a syndrome of decreased physical function and reserves, preventing patients from coping with stressful events. PF screening tools in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) can help evaluate the risk of complications and death. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of five screening tools in detecting PF and their ability to predict 18-month mortality in LC. : The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Fried frailty phenotype (FFP), Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) were compared with the Liver Frailty Index (LFI) as the method of reference. Patients with an LFI ≥ 4.5, SPPB ≤ 8, FFP ≥ 3, CFS ≥ 6 points, and those walking <250 m, were considered frail. A total of 109 consecutive patients with stable LC were included [63.3% male, median age 62 years, (IQR 52-70), MELD 9 (7-14.5), 46.8% with decompensated LC (DC)]. PF was present in 23.9%, 27.5%, 41.3%, 13.8%, and 28.4% as assessed by the LFI, SPPB, FFP, CFS, and 6MWT, respectively. Cohen's kappa measurement of agreement of four of the tools with LFI was 0.568, 0.334, 0.439, and 0.502, respectively ( < 0.001 for each). Kaplan-Meier survival curves at 18 months showed higher mortality in frail patients compared to non-frail patients by any method (log rank < 0.05). In the multivariate models, PF defined by any method emerged as an independent prognostic factor of 18-month mortality after adjustment for age, gender, and MELD-score. : Patients characterized as frail by five screening tools were not identical. However, PF defined by either method was proven to be an independent poor prognostic factor for long-term mortality after adjustment for covariates.
身体虚弱(PF)是一种身体功能和储备下降的综合征,会使患者无法应对应激事件。肝硬化(LC)患者的PF筛查工具有助于评估并发症和死亡风险。本研究的目的是评估五种筛查工具在检测PF方面的性能及其预测LC患者18个月死亡率的能力。
将短身体性能测试(SPPB)、弗里德虚弱表型(FFP)、临床虚弱量表(CFS)和6分钟步行试验(6MWT)与作为参考方法的肝脏虚弱指数(LFI)进行比较。LFI≥4.5、SPPB≤8、FFP≥3、CFS≥6分以及步行距离<250米的患者被视为虚弱。共纳入109例连续的稳定LC患者[男性占63.3%,中位年龄62岁(四分位间距52 - 70),终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分为9(7 - 14.5),46.8%为失代偿性LC(DC)]。通过LFI、SPPB、FFP、CFS和6MWT评估,PF的发生率分别为23.9%、27.5%、41.3%、13.8%和28.4%。四种工具与LFI的一致性的科恩kappa系数分别为0.568、0.334、0.439和0.502(每种均<0.001)。18个月时的Kaplan - Meier生存曲线显示,无论采用何种方法,虚弱患者的死亡率均高于非虚弱患者(对数秩检验<0.05)。在多变量模型中,经年龄、性别和MELD评分调整后,任何一种方法定义的PF均成为18个月死亡率的独立预后因素。
通过五种筛查工具被判定为虚弱的患者并不相同。然而,经协变量调整后,任何一种方法定义的PF均被证明是长期死亡率的独立不良预后因素。