Stuby Loric, Suppan Mélanie, Desmettre Thibaut, Carrera Emmanuel, Genoud Matthieu, Suppan Laurent
Genève TEAM Ambulances, Emergency Medical Services, 1201 Geneva, Switzerland.
Division of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 4;13(17):5233. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175233.
Prehospital detection and triage of stroke patients mostly rely on the use of large vessel occlusion prediction scales to decrease onsite time. These quick but simplified scores, though useful, prevent prehospital providers from detecting posterior strokes and isolated symptoms such as limb ataxia or hemianopia. In the present case, an ambulance was dispatched to a 46-year-old man known for ophthalmic migraines and high blood pressure, who presented isolated visual symptoms different from those associated with his usual migraine attacks. Although the assessment advocated by the prehospital guideline was negative for stroke, the paramedic who assessed the patient was one of the few trained in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale assessment. Based on this assessment, the paramedic activated the fast-track stroke alarm and an ischemic stroke in the right temporal lobe was finally confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging. Current prehospital practice enables paramedics to detect anterior strokes but often limits the detection of posterior events or more subtle symptoms. Failure to identify such strokes delay or even forestall the initiation of thrombolytic therapy, thereby worsening patient outcomes. We therefore advocate a two-step prehospital approach: first, to avoid unnecessary delays, the prehospital stroke assessment should be carried out using a fast large vessel occlusion prediction scale; then, if this assessment is negative but potential stroke symptoms are present, a full National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale assessment could be performed to detect neurological deficits overlooked by the fast stroke scale.
中风患者的院前检测和分诊大多依赖于使用大血管闭塞预测量表,以减少现场停留时间。这些快速但简化的评分虽然有用,但却使院前急救人员无法检测到后循环中风以及诸如肢体共济失调或偏盲等孤立症状。在本病例中,一辆救护车被派往一名46岁的男子处,该男子有眼部偏头痛和高血压病史,此次出现了与他平常偏头痛发作不同的孤立视觉症状。尽管院前指南所倡导的评估显示中风为阴性,但评估该患者的护理人员是少数接受过美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评估培训的人员之一。基于这一评估,护理人员启动了快速通道中风警报,最终通过磁共振成像确认右侧颞叶存在缺血性中风。目前的院前急救实践使护理人员能够检测到前循环中风,但往往限制了对后循环事件或更细微症状的检测。未能识别此类中风会延迟甚至阻碍溶栓治疗的启动,从而使患者预后恶化。因此,我们提倡一种两步式院前急救方法:首先,为避免不必要的延误,应使用快速大血管闭塞预测量表进行院前中风评估;然后,如果该评估为阴性但存在潜在中风症状,则可进行完整的美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评估,以检测快速中风量表遗漏的神经功能缺损。