Department of Health, Education, and Technology, Luleå University of Technology, 97187 Luleå, Sweden.
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Sep 7;24(17):5811. doi: 10.3390/s24175811.
Sensorimotor disturbances such as disturbed cervical joint position sense (JPS) and reduced reaction time and velocity in fast cervical movements have been demonstrated in people with neck pain. While these sensorimotor functions have been assessed mainly in movement science laboratories, new sensor technology enables objective assessments in the clinic. The aim was to investigate concurrent validity of a VR-based JPS test and a new cervical reaction acuity (CRA) test. Twenty participants, thirteen asymptomatic and seven with neck pain, participated in this cross-sectional study. The JPS test, including outcome measures of absolute error (AE), constant error (CE), and variable error (VE), and the CRA test, including outcome measures of reaction time and maximum velocity, were performed using a VR headset and compared to a gold standard optical motion capture system. The mean bias (assessed with the Bland-Altman method) between VR and the gold standard system ranged from 0.0° to 2.4° for the JPS test variables. For the CRA test, reaction times demonstrated a mean bias of -19.9 milliseconds (ms), and maximum velocity a mean bias of -6.5 degrees per seconds (°/s). The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between VR and gold standard were good to excellent (ICC 0.835-0.998) for the JPS test, and excellent (ICC 0.931-0.954) for reaction time and maximum velocity for the CRA test. The results show acceptable concurrent validity for the VR technology for assessment of JPS and CRA. A slightly larger bias was observed in JPS left rotation which should be considered in future research.
人们已经在颈部疼痛患者中发现了诸如颈椎关节位置觉(JPS)紊乱以及快速颈椎运动时反应时间和速度减慢等感觉运动障碍。虽然这些感觉运动功能主要在运动科学实验室中进行评估,但新的传感器技术能够在临床中进行客观评估。本研究旨在调查基于虚拟现实(VR)的 JPS 测试和新的颈椎反应敏锐度(CRA)测试的同时效度。共有 20 名参与者,其中 13 名无症状,7 名颈部疼痛,参与了这项横断面研究。使用 VR 头戴式设备进行 JPS 测试,包括绝对误差(AE)、恒定误差(CE)和可变误差(VE)等结果测量值,以及 CRA 测试,包括反应时间和最大速度等结果测量值,并与光学运动捕捉系统的金标准进行比较。VR 和金标准系统之间的平均偏差(通过 Bland-Altman 方法评估)在 JPS 测试变量中为 0.0°至 2.4°。对于 CRA 测试,反应时间的平均偏差为-19.9 毫秒(ms),最大速度的平均偏差为-6.5 度每秒(°/s)。VR 和金标准之间的组内相关系数(ICC)在 JPS 测试中为 0.835-0.998(良好至极好),在 CRA 测试中反应时间和最大速度的 ICC 为 0.931-0.954(极好)。结果表明,用于评估 JPS 和 CRA 的 VR 技术具有可接受的同时效度。在 JPS 左旋时观察到稍大的偏差,在未来的研究中应予以考虑。