• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于解剖学的双股隧道腓骨后外侧角重建在外部旋转和内翻应力下显示出最低的残余松弛度:体外生物力学研究的系统评价和网状Meta分析

Anatomic Fibular-Based Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction With 2 Femoral Tunnels Shows Lowest Residual Laxity With External Rotation and Varus Stresses: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of In Vitro Biomechanical Studies.

作者信息

Bram Joshua T, White Alexander E, Cusano Antonio, Halvorsen Heidi, Zhuang Sophia, Levy Bruce, Marx Robert G

机构信息

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A..

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2025 May;41(5):1557-1577.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.046. Epub 2024 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.046
PMID:39276947
Abstract

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis of in vitro cadaveric, biomechanical studies evaluating described techniques for posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction, including fibular- and tibiofibular-based techniques.

METHODS

The PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched in December 2023 for cadaveric studies evaluating PLC reconstruction. After a descriptive summary, a series of frequentist network meta-analyses comparing (1) nonanatomic fibular-based (single femoral tunnel), (2) anatomic fibular-based (double femoral tunnel), and (3) anatomic tibiofibular-based PLC reconstructions with the intact knee were performed for both external rotation (ER) and varus laxity from 0° to 90° of knee flexion. Pooled treatment estimates were calculated as mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effects models.

RESULTS

A total of 31 studies were included. Nonanatomic fibular-based reconstructions showed increased ER laxity compared with the intact state between 30° and 90° of flexion (MD, 1.66° [95% CI, -0.27° to 3.59°] at 0° [P = .093]; MD, 2.29° [95% CI, 0.44° to 4.13°] at 30° [P = .015]; MD, 3.04° [95% CI, 0.95° to 5.12°] at 60° [P = .004]; and MD, 4.30° [95% CI, 1.41° to 7.19°] at 90° [P = .004]). The anatomic fibular- and tibiofibular-based reconstructions restored ER stability at all flexion values (except at 0° for tibiofibular based). All 3 reconstructions restored varus stability compared with the intact state in all scenarios except the anatomic fibular-based techniques at 0° (MD, 0.85° [95% CI, 0.06° to 1.63°]; P = .034). Across the assessed ER and varus laxity states, the anatomic fibular-based reconstruction was ranked "best" in 5 of 8 scenarios.

CONCLUSIONS

PLC reconstructions using nonanatomic fibular-based techniques showed increased residual laxity in ER from 30° to 90° of knee flexion. Conversely, anatomic fibular- and tibiofibular-based reconstructions showed ER and varus laxity similar to that in the intact knee state across most of the assessed knee flexion values.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Various techniques have been described for PLC reconstruction. However, no study has comprehensively compared the biomechanical properties of these reconstructions with one another.

摘要

目的

对评估后外侧角(PLC)重建所述技术(包括基于腓骨和胫腓骨的技术)的体外尸体生物力学研究进行系统评价和网状Meta分析。

方法

2023年12月检索了PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库,以查找评估PLC重建的尸体研究。在进行描述性总结后,针对膝关节从0°至90°屈曲时的外旋(ER)和内翻松弛度,进行了一系列频率学派网状Meta分析,比较(1)非解剖学腓骨基(单股骨隧道)、(2)解剖学腓骨基(双股骨隧道)和(3)解剖学胫腓骨基PLC重建与完整膝关节的情况。使用随机效应模型计算合并治疗估计值,以均数差(MDs)及其95%置信区间(CIs)表示。

结果

共纳入31项研究。非解剖学腓骨基重建在30°至90°屈曲时与完整状态相比显示ER松弛度增加(0°时MD为1.66°[95%CI,-0.27°至3.59°] [P = 0.093];30°时MD为2.29°[95%CI,0.44°至4.13°] [P = 0.015];60°时MD为3.04°[95%CI,0.95°至5.12°] [P = 0.004];90°时MD为4.30°[95%CI,1.41°至7.19°] [P = 0.004])。解剖学腓骨基和胫腓骨基重建在所有屈曲值时均恢复了ER稳定性(胫腓骨基在0°时除外)。与完整状态相比,所有3种重建在所有情况下均恢复了内翻稳定性,但解剖学腓骨基技术在0°时除外(MD为0.85°[95%CI,0.06°至1.63°];P = 0.034)。在评估的ER和内翻松弛度状态中,解剖学腓骨基重建在8种情况中的5种中排名“最佳”。

结论

使用非解剖学腓骨基技术的PLC重建在膝关节30°至90°屈曲时ER的残余松弛度增加。相反,解剖学腓骨基和胫腓骨基重建在大多数评估的膝关节屈曲值时显示出与完整膝关节状态相似的ER和内翻松弛度。

临床相关性

已描述了多种用于PLC重建的技术。然而,尚无研究全面比较这些重建的生物力学特性。

相似文献

1
Anatomic Fibular-Based Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction With 2 Femoral Tunnels Shows Lowest Residual Laxity With External Rotation and Varus Stresses: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of In Vitro Biomechanical Studies.基于解剖学的双股隧道腓骨后外侧角重建在外部旋转和内翻应力下显示出最低的残余松弛度:体外生物力学研究的系统评价和网状Meta分析
Arthroscopy. 2025 May;41(5):1557-1577.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.046. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
2
Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Biomechanical Studies.后外侧角重建:生物力学研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Am J Sports Med. 2025 May;53(6):1524-1534. doi: 10.1177/03635465241266264. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
3
Biomechanics Following Isolated Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction Comparing a Fibular-Based Docking Technique With a Tibia and Fibular-Based Anatomic Technique Show Either Technique is Acceptable.单独后外侧角重建术后的生物力学:比较基于腓骨的对接技术与基于胫骨和腓骨的解剖技术,发现两种技术均可行。
Arthroscopy. 2020 May;36(5):1376-1385. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.12.007. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
4
Biomechanical Assessment of Knee Laxity After a Novel Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction Technique.新型后外侧角重建技术后膝关节松弛的生物力学评估。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Mar;50(4):962-967. doi: 10.1177/03635465211070553. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
5
Comparison of posterolateral corner reconstructions using computer-assisted navigation.计算机辅助导航下后外侧角重建的比较。
Arthroscopy. 2010 Aug;26(8):1088-95. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.12.014. Epub 2010 May 14.
6
Editorial Commentary: Anatomic Tibiofibular and Partially Anatomic-Based Fibular Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction Techniques Are Biomechanically Superior to Nonanatomic Reconstruction Techniques: A Tibial Tunnel Is the Gold Standard for an Anatomic Reconstruction.编者按:解剖学的胫腓骨及部分基于解剖学的腓骨后外侧角重建技术在生物力学上优于非解剖学重建技术:胫骨隧道是解剖学重建的金标准。
Arthroscopy. 2025 May;41(5):1578-1581. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.11.053. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
7
Biomechanical comparisons between 4-strand and modified Larson 2-strand procedures for reconstruction of the posterolateral corner of the knee.四股与改良 Larson 双股重建膝后外侧角的生物力学比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jul;39(7):1462-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546511404135. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
8
A comparison of modified Larson and 'anatomic' posterolateral corner reconstructions in knees with combined PCL and posterolateral corner deficiency.膝关节后交叉韧带和后外侧角联合损伤时改良Larson法与“解剖学”后外侧角重建术的比较
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 Mar;17(3):305-12. doi: 10.1007/s00167-008-0696-6. Epub 2008 Dec 20.
9
Comparison of three surgical techniques of posterolateral knee reconstruction: A cadaver study.三种后外侧膝关节重建手术技术的比较:尸体研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 Dec;108(8):103414. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103414. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
10
Fibular- Versus Tibiofibular-Based Reconstruction of the Posterolateral Corner of the Knee: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.基于腓骨与胫腓骨的膝关节后外侧角重建:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Dec;51(14):3880-3892. doi: 10.1177/03635465221138548. Epub 2023 Jan 4.