Jacinto Miguel, Antunes Raul, Monteiro Diogo, Rodrigues Filipe, Amaro Nuno, Campos Maria João, Ferreira José Pedro, Matos Rui
ESECS-Polytechnic of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.
Research Center in Sport Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development (CIDESD), Vila Real, Portugal.
Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2024 Sep 17;42(1):68-86. doi: 10.1123/apaq.2024-0085. Print 2025 Jan 1.
This study investigated the effects of two physical exercise programs for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Twenty-one participants were assigned to an indoor group (IG, n = 7; 24-week gym intervention with machine), an outdoor group (OG, n = 7; 24-week outdoor intervention with low-cost materials) or a control group. The outcomes assessed included quality of life, dementia, and functional capacity. The IG significantly improved physical well-being compared with the control group (p = .017). There were no significant differences in dementia score between groups and moments. Postintervention, the IG showed improvements compared with the control group for the 30-s sit-to-stand test (p = .03), timed up-and-go (p = .00), and 6-min-walk test (p = .033) and between moments in the IG for 30-s sit-to-stand test (pre ≠ post; p = .007) and 6-min-walk test (pre ≠ post; p = .007). Outdoor interventions appeared effective for physical well-being, while indoor interventions using weight-training machines benefited functional capacity. No significant effects were observed for dementia/cognitive decline.
本研究调查了两种体育锻炼方案对患有智力和发育障碍的成年人的影响。21名参与者被分配到室内组(IG,n = 7;进行为期24周的使用器械的健身房干预)、室外组(OG,n = 7;进行为期24周的使用低成本材料的室外干预)或对照组。评估的结果包括生活质量、痴呆症和功能能力。与对照组相比,室内组的身体健康状况有显著改善(p = .017)。各组之间以及不同时间点的痴呆症评分没有显著差异。干预后,室内组在30秒坐立测试(p = .03)、计时起立行走测试(p = .00)和6分钟步行测试(p = .033)中与对照组相比有改善,并且在室内组内的30秒坐立测试(前≠后;p = .007)和6分钟步行测试(前≠后;p = .007)的不同时间点之间也有改善。室外干预似乎对身体健康有效,而使用重量训练器械的室内干预有利于功能能力。未观察到对痴呆症/认知衰退有显著影响。