• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Letter to editor regarding "Quality and correctness of AI-generated versus human-written abstracts in psychiatric research papers".

作者信息

Matsubara Shigeki

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koga Red Cross Hospital, 1150 Shimoyama, Koga, Ibaraki 306-0014, Japan; Medical Examination Center, Ibaraki Western Medical Center, 555 Otsuka, Chikusei, Ibaraki 308-0813, Japan.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2024 Dec;342:116194. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116194. Epub 2024 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116194
PMID:39278192
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Letter to editor regarding "Quality and correctness of AI-generated versus human-written abstracts in psychiatric research papers".致编辑的信：关于“精神病学研究论文中人工智能生成摘要与人工撰写摘要的质量和正确性”
Psychiatry Res. 2024 Dec;342:116194. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116194. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
2
Quality and correctness of AI-generated versus human-written abstracts in psychiatric research papers.人工智能生成与人类撰写的精神科研究论文摘要的质量和准确性。
Psychiatry Res. 2024 Nov;341:116145. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116145. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
3
Comparisons of Quality, Correctness, and Similarity Between ChatGPT-Generated and Human-Written Abstracts for Basic Research: Cross-Sectional Study.ChatGPT 生成的和人工撰写的基础研究摘要在质量、正确性和相似性方面的比较：横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 25;25:e51229. doi: 10.2196/51229.
4
Human vs machine: identifying ChatGPT-generated abstracts in Gynecology and Urogynecology.人机之争：在妇科和泌尿外科学中识别 ChatGPT 生成的摘要。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Aug;231(2):276.e1-276.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.04.045. Epub 2024 May 6.
5
Assessing the Reproducibility of the Structured Abstracts Generated by ChatGPT and Bard Compared to Human-Written Abstracts in the Field of Spine Surgery: Comparative Analysis.评估 ChatGPT 和 Bard 生成的结构化摘要与脊柱外科领域人类撰写的摘要在可重复性方面的比较：对比分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 26;26:e52001. doi: 10.2196/52001.
6
Comparison of an AI-Generated Case Report With a Human-Written Case Report: Practical Considerations for AI-Assisted Medical Writing.人工智能生成的病例报告与人工撰写的病例报告的比较：人工智能辅助医学写作的实际考量
Cureus. 2024 May 16;16(5):e60461. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60461. eCollection 2024 May.
7
What's the difference between human-written manuscripts versus ChatGPT-generated manuscripts involving "human touch"?
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2025 Feb;51(2):e16226. doi: 10.1111/jog.16226.
8
Human versus artificial intelligence-generated arthroplasty literature: A single-blinded analysis of perceived communication, quality, and authorship source.人工与人工智能生成的关节置换文献：感知交流、质量和作者来源的单盲分析。
Int J Med Robot. 2024 Feb;20(1):e2621. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2621.
9
Comparing letters written by humans and ChatGPT: A preliminary study.比较人类与ChatGPT撰写的信件：一项初步研究。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jan;168(1):320-325. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15827. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
10
A Study on Distinguishing ChatGPT-Generated and Human-Written Orthopaedic Abstracts by Reviewers: Decoding the Discrepancies.评审者区分ChatGPT生成和人工撰写的骨科摘要的研究：解读差异
Cureus. 2023 Nov 21;15(11):e49166. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49166. eCollection 2023 Nov.