Moccia P
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1985 Jul;7(4):33-8. doi: 10.1097/00012272-198507000-00006.
Although this critique accepts the assumptions of Wilson and Fitzpatrick concerning a necessary congruence between a science's world view and its method of inquiry, it refutes their argument for Bunge's dialectic as a method appropriate for the study of human phenomena. It is argued that Bunge's dialectic is developed from a dualistic universe and is, therefore, incompatible with Rogers's views on the unitary nature of phenomena. Another, more internally consistent interpretation of the dialectic is introduced for consideration as an alternative.
尽管这一批评接受了威尔逊和菲茨帕特里克关于一门科学的世界观与其探究方法之间必然一致性的假设，但它驳斥了他们认为邦格辩证法是适用于研究人类现象的方法的论点。有人认为，邦格的辩证法是从二元论宇宙发展而来的，因此与罗杰斯关于现象统一性的观点不相容。本文引入了另一种在内部更为一致的辩证法解释以供考虑，作为一种替代方案。
