Baldwin Jack, Brookfield Adam, Whitehead George F S, Natrajan Louise S, McInnes Eric J L, Oakley Meagan S, Mills David P
Department of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, U.K.
Inorg Chem. 2024 Sep 30;63(39):18120-18136. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c02888. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
While lanthanide (Ln) silylamide chemistry is mature, the corresponding silylphosphide chemistry is underdeveloped, with [Sm{P(SiMe)}{μ-P(SiMe)}Sm(THF)] being the sole example of a structurally authenticated Ln(II) silylphosphide complex. Here, we expand the Ln(II) {P(SiMe)} chemistry through the synthesis and characterization of nine complexes. The dinuclear "ate" salt-occluded complexes [{LnP(SiMe)}(μ-I)K(THF)] (; Ln = Sm, Eu) and polymeric "ate" complex [KYb{P(SiMe)}{μ-K[P(SiMe)]}] () were prepared by the respective salt metathesis reactions of parent [LnI(THF)] (Ln = Sm, Eu, Yb) with 2 or 3 equiv of K{P(SiMe)} in diethyl ether. The separate treatment of these complexes with either pyridine or 18-crown-6 led to the formation of the mononuclear solvated adducts -[Ln{P(SiMe)}(py)] (; Ln = Sm, Eu, Yb) and [Ln{P(SiMe)}(18-crown-6)] (; Ln = Sm, Eu, Yb), with concomitant loss of K{P(SiMe)}. The complexes were characterized by a combination of NMR, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), attenuated total reflectance infrared (ATR-IR), electronic absorption and emission spectroscopies, elemental analysis, SQUID magnetometry, and single crystal X-ray diffraction. We find that these complexes contrast with those of related Ln(II) bis(silyl)amide complexes due to differences in ligand donor atom hardness and ligand steric requirements from Ln-P bonds being longer than Ln-N bonds. This leads to higher coordination numbers, shorter luminescence lifetimes, and smaller eas-axis magnetic anisotropy parameters.
虽然镧系元素(Ln)硅基酰胺化学已成熟,但相应的硅基磷化物化学却发展滞后,[Sm{P(SiMe)}{μ-P(SiMe)}Sm(THF)]是唯一经结构验证的Ln(II)硅基磷化物配合物实例。在此,我们通过合成和表征九种配合物扩展了Ln(II) {P(SiMe)}化学。双核“ate”盐包合配合物[{LnP(SiMe)}(μ-I)K(THF)](;Ln = Sm,Eu)和聚合物“ate”配合物[KYb{P(SiMe)}{μ-K[P(SiMe)]}]()是通过母体[LnI(THF)](Ln = Sm,Eu,Yb)与2或3当量的K{P(SiMe)}在乙醚中进行相应的盐复分解反应制备的。用吡啶或18-冠-6分别处理这些配合物会导致形成单核溶剂化加合物-[Ln{P(SiMe)}(py)](;Ln = Sm,Eu,Yb)和[Ln{P(SiMe)}(18-冠-6)](;Ln = Sm,Eu,Yb),同时失去K{P(SiMe)}。通过核磁共振(NMR)、电子顺磁共振(EPR)、衰减全反射红外(ATR-IR)、电子吸收和发射光谱、元素分析、超导量子干涉仪磁强计以及单晶X射线衍射等方法对这些配合物进行了表征。我们发现,由于配体供体原子硬度的差异以及Ln-P键比Ln-N键长导致的配体空间要求不同,这些配合物与相关的Ln(II)双(硅基)酰胺配合物形成对比。这导致了更高的配位数、更短的发光寿命和更小的易轴磁各向异性参数。