Suppr超能文献

个体与混合的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染的鼻咽拭子标本之间逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)循环阈值的比较。

Comparison of RT-PCR cycle threshold values between individual and pooled SARS-CoV-2 infected nasopharyngeal swab specimens.

作者信息

Yani Handa, Yuan Toh D, Lubis Aridamuriany D, Iswara Lia K, Lubis Inke Nd

机构信息

Department of Pediatric, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia.

Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Narra J. 2024 Aug;4(2):e765. doi: 10.52225/narra.v4i2.765. Epub 2024 Jul 19.

Abstract

The molecular reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing of respiratory tract swabs has become mandatory to confirm the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, RT-PCR tests are expensive, require standardized equipment, and relatively long testing times, and the sample pooling method has been introduced to solve this issue. The aim of this study was to compare the cycle threshold (Ct) values of the individual sample and pooled sample methods to assess how accurate the pooling method was. Repeat RT-PCR examinations were initially performed to confirm the Ct values for each sample before running the pooled test procedure. Sample extraction and amplification were performed in both assays to detect ORF1ab, N, and E genes with a cut-off point value of Ct <38. Overall, there was no difference in Ct values between individual sample and pooled sample groups at all concentrations (=0.259) and for all pooled sizes. Only pooled size of five could detect the Ct value in the pooled samples for all concentration samples, including low-concentration sample (Ct values 36 to 38). This study highlighted that pooled RT-PCR testing strategy did not reduce the quality of individually measured RT-PCR Ct values. A pool size of five could provide a practical technique to expand the screening capacity of RT-PCR.

摘要

对呼吸道拭子进行分子逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测已成为确诊2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的必要手段。然而,RT-PCR检测成本高昂,需要标准化设备,且检测时间相对较长,因此引入了样本混合方法来解决这一问题。本研究的目的是比较单个样本和混合样本方法的循环阈值(Ct)值,以评估混合方法的准确性。在进行混合检测程序之前,首先进行重复RT-PCR检测以确认每个样本的Ct值。两种检测均进行样本提取和扩增,以检测开放阅读框1ab(ORF1ab)、核衣壳蛋白(N)和包膜蛋白(E)基因,截断值为Ct<38。总体而言,在所有浓度(=0.259)和所有混合样本量下,单个样本组和混合样本组的Ct值均无差异。只有混合样本量为五时,才能检测所有浓度样本(包括低浓度样本,Ct值为36至38)的混合样本中的Ct值。本研究强调,混合RT-PCR检测策略不会降低单独测量的RT-PCR Ct值的质量。混合样本量为五可以提供一种实用技术来扩大RT-PCR的筛查能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0f5/11391988/3ffbd37dd757/NarraJ-4-e765-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验