Christenson Eleanor, Acharya Deeksha, Berlacher Kathryn, Koczo Agnes
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Aug 26;54:101498. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101498. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Data on treatment of spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) has evolved with guidance from national societies beginning around 2018. Given emerging guidance and relatively uncommon presentation of SCAD, we hypothesized that a specialized SCAD clinic would improve guidance-based care.
We utilized a system-wide electronic medical record search to identify individuals with SCAD diagnosis from 2018 to 2023. All diagnostic angiograms were reviewed to verify diagnosis. We analyzed frequency of guidance-based care since 2018 system-wide. We also compared guidance-based care for individuals with index visits to the SCAD outpatient clinic as compared to non-SCAD clinic providers from initiation of specialty clinic in 2021.
Differences were observed in pregnancy and contraception discussions (88 % vs 0 %, p < 0.001) among pre-menopausal individuals in SCAD clinic compared to non-SCAD clinics. Safety of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in menopausal women was addressed more by SCAD clinic providers (85 % vs 7 %, p < 0.001). There was more fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) screening in SCAD clinic (100 % vs 30 %, p < 0.001). Among individuals with migraines, there was more discussion of triggering medications (triptans) in SCAD clinic (80 % vs 14 %, p = 0.008). In individuals prescribed statins not by primary prevention guidelines and without atherosclerosis, there was a trend toward more discussion of statin use in SCAD clinic follow up vs non-SCAD clinic providers (63 % vs 17 %, p = 0.06).
Individuals with follow up in SCAD clinic compared to non-SCAD clinics were more likely to have future pregnancy and contraception counseling, discussion of HRT safety, and FMD screening following index outpatient visit. Future quality improvement initiatives will target these aspects of guidance-based care among non-SCAD clinic providers with integration into cardiology fellow training.
关于自发性冠状动脉夹层(SCAD)治疗的数据自2018年左右开始在国家学会的指导下不断演变。鉴于新出现的指导意见以及SCAD相对不常见的表现,我们推测专门的SCAD诊所会改善基于指导的治疗。
我们利用全系统电子病历搜索来识别2018年至2023年期间诊断为SCAD的个体。对所有诊断性血管造影进行审查以核实诊断。我们分析了自2018年以来全系统基于指导的治疗频率。我们还比较了自2021年专科诊所设立以来,在SCAD门诊进行首次就诊的个体与非SCAD诊所提供者在基于指导的治疗方面的情况。
与非SCAD诊所相比,SCAD诊所中绝经前个体在妊娠和避孕讨论方面存在差异(88%对0%,p<0.001)。SCAD诊所提供者对绝经后女性激素替代疗法(HRT)安全性的讨论更多(85%对7%,p<0.001)。SCAD诊所进行纤维肌发育异常(FMD)筛查的情况更多(100%对30%,p<0.001)。在患有偏头痛的个体中,SCAD诊所对触发药物(曲坦类药物)的讨论更多(80%对14%,p = 0.008)。在未按照一级预防指南且无动脉粥样硬化而开具他汀类药物的个体中,与非SCAD诊所提供者相比,SCAD诊所随访中对他汀类药物使用的讨论有增多趋势(63%对17%,p = 0.06)。
与非SCAD诊所相比,在SCAD诊所接受随访的个体在首次门诊就诊后更有可能接受未来妊娠和避孕咨询、HRT安全性讨论以及FMD筛查。未来的质量改进举措将针对非SCAD诊所提供者基于指导的治疗的这些方面,并将其纳入心脏病学住院医师培训。