• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项对24个国家固定剂量复方抗高血压药物处方的横断面调查,包括定性见解。

A Cross-Sectional Survey of Fixed-Dose Combination Antihypertensive Medicine Prescribing in Twenty-Four Countries, Including Qualitative Insights.

作者信息

O'Hagan Edel, McIntyre Daniel, Nguyen Tu, Tan Kit Mun, Hanlon Peter, Siddiqui Maha, Anastase Dzudie, Lim Toon Wei, Uzendu Anezi, Van Nguyen Tan, Wong Wei Jin, Khor Hui Min, Kumar Pramod, Usherwood Timothy, Chow Clara K

机构信息

Westmead Applied Research Centre, The University of Sydney, Entrance K, Level 5, Westmead Hospital, Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia.

The George Institute for Global Health, Level 18, International Towers 3, 300 Barangaroo Ave, Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia.

出版信息

Glob Heart. 2024 Sep 12;19(1):73. doi: 10.5334/gh.1353. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.5334/gh.1353
PMID:39281000
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11396169/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treatment inertia, non-adherence and non-persistence to medical treatment contribute to poor blood pressure (BP) control worldwide. Fixed dose combination (FDC) antihypertensive medicines simplify prescribing patterns and improve adherence. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with prescribing FDC antihypertensive medicines and to understand if these factors differ among doctors worldwide.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted online from June 2023 to January 2024 to recruit doctors. We collaborated with an international network of researchers and clinicians identified through institutional connections. A passive snowballing recruitment strategy was employed, where network members forwarded the survey link to their clinical colleagues. The survey instrument, developed through a literature review, interviews with academic and clinical researchers, and pilot testing, assessed participants perspectives on prescribing FDC antihypertensive medicines for hypertension. Participants rated their level of agreement (5-point Likert scale) with statements representing six barriers and four facilitators to FDC use.

FINDINGS

Data from 191 surveys were available for analysis. 25% (n = 47) of participants worked in high-income countries, 38% (n = 73) in upper-middle income, 25% (n = 48) in lower-middle income, 6% (n = 10) in low-income countries. Forty percent (n = 70) of participants were between 36-45 years of age; two thirds were male. Cost was reported as a barrier to prescribing FDC antihypertensive medicines [51% (n = 87) agreeing or strongly agreeing], followed by doctors' confidence in BP measured in clinic [40%, (n = 70)], access [37%, (n = 67)], appointment duration [35%, (n = 61)], concerns about side-effects [(21%, n = 37)], and non-adherence [12%, (n = 21)]. Facilitators to FDC antihypertensive polypills prescribing were clinician facing, such as access to educational supports [79%, (n = 143)], more BP measurement data [67%, (n = 120)], a clinical nudge in health records [61%, (n = 109)] and patient-facing including improved patient health literacy [49%, (n = 88)]. The levels of agreement and strong agreement across all barriers and facilitators were similar for participants working in higher or lower income countries. Across all countries, participants rated FDC antihypertensive medications highly valuable for managing patients with non-adherence, (82% reported high or very high value), for patients with high pill burden (80%).

INTERPRETATION

Cost and access were the most common barriers to prescribing FDCs across high- and low-income countries. While greater educational support for clinicians was perceived as the leading potential facilitator of FDC use, this seems unlikely to be effective without addressing access.

摘要

背景

治疗惰性、不依从和不坚持治疗导致全球范围内血压(BP)控制不佳。固定剂量复方(FDC)抗高血压药物简化了处方模式并提高了依从性。本研究的目的是确定与开具FDC抗高血压药物相关的因素,并了解这些因素在全球医生中是否存在差异。

方法

2023年6月至2024年1月进行了一项在线横断面调查以招募医生。我们与通过机构联系确定的国际研究人员和临床医生网络合作。采用了被动滚雪球式招募策略,网络成员将调查链接转发给他们的临床同事。通过文献综述、对学术和临床研究人员的访谈以及预试验开发的调查工具,评估了参与者对为高血压开具FDC抗高血压药物的看法。参与者对代表FDC使用的六个障碍和四个促进因素的陈述的同意程度(5点李克特量表)进行评分。

结果

191份调查问卷的数据可供分析。25%(n = 47)的参与者在高收入国家工作,38%(n = 73)在中高收入国家,25%(n = 48)在中低收入国家,6%(n = 10)在低收入国家。40%(n = 70)的参与者年龄在36 - 45岁之间;三分之二为男性。成本被报告为开具FDC抗高血压药物的障碍[51%(n = 87)同意或强烈同意],其次是医生对诊所测量血压值的信心[40%,(n = 70)]、可及性[37%,(n = 67)]、预约时长[35%,(n = 61)]、对副作用的担忧[(21%,n = 37)]和不依从[12%,(n = 21)]。FDC抗高血压复方制剂处方的促进因素是面向临床医生的,如获得教育支持[79%,(n = 143)]、更多血压测量数据[67%,(n = 120)]、健康记录中的临床提示[61%,(n = 109)]以及面向患者的包括提高患者健康素养[49%,(n = 88)]。在高收入或低收入国家工作的参与者在所有障碍和促进因素上的同意和强烈同意程度相似。在所有国家中,参与者对FDC抗高血压药物在管理不依从患者(82%报告有高或非常高的价值)、高 pill负担患者(80%)方面给予高度评价。

解读

成本和可及性是高收入和低收入国家开具FDC的最常见障碍。虽然对临床医生更多的教育支持被视为FDC使用的主要潜在促进因素,但如果不解决可及性问题,这似乎不太可能有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb42/11396169/20c4790ad020/gh-19-1-1353-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb42/11396169/ee650688d4fe/gh-19-1-1353-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb42/11396169/a0e2b1b2fb9a/gh-19-1-1353-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb42/11396169/f6a031e5f792/gh-19-1-1353-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb42/11396169/20c4790ad020/gh-19-1-1353-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb42/11396169/ee650688d4fe/gh-19-1-1353-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb42/11396169/a0e2b1b2fb9a/gh-19-1-1353-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb42/11396169/f6a031e5f792/gh-19-1-1353-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb42/11396169/20c4790ad020/gh-19-1-1353-g4.jpg

相似文献

1
A Cross-Sectional Survey of Fixed-Dose Combination Antihypertensive Medicine Prescribing in Twenty-Four Countries, Including Qualitative Insights.一项对24个国家固定剂量复方抗高血压药物处方的横断面调查,包括定性见解。
Glob Heart. 2024 Sep 12;19(1):73. doi: 10.5334/gh.1353. eCollection 2024.
2
Association of Low-Dose Triple Combination Therapy With Therapeutic Inertia and Prescribing Patterns in Patients With Hypertension: A Secondary Analysis of the TRIUMPH Trial.低剂量三联疗法与高血压患者治疗惰性和处方模式的关联:TRIUMPH 试验的二次分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Nov 1;5(11):1219-1226. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.2739.
3
Treatment patterns and adherence to antihypertensive combination therapies in Japan using a claims database.利用索赔数据库研究日本的降压联合治疗模式和用药依从性。
Hypertens Res. 2019 Feb;42(2):249-256. doi: 10.1038/s41440-018-0127-0. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
4
Antihypertensive Medication Regimens Used by US Adults With Hypertension and the Potential for Fixed-Dose Combination Products: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2015 to 2020.美国高血压成年人使用的降压药物方案及固定剂量复方制剂的应用潜力:2015 年至 2020 年全国健康和营养调查。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Jun 6;12(11):e028573. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028573. Epub 2023 May 9.
5
May Measure Month 2022 in Italy: A Focus on Fixed-dose Combination, Therapeutic Adherence, and Medical Inertia in a Nationwide Survey.2022 年 5 月意大利测量月:全国调查中固定剂量复方制剂、治疗依从性和医学惰性的焦点。
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2024 May;31(3):309-320. doi: 10.1007/s40292-024-00642-4. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
6
Patient, clinician and logistic barriers to blood pressure control among adult hypertensives in rural district hospitals in Rwanda: a cross-sectional study.卢旺达农村地区医院成年高血压患者血压控制的患者、临床医生和后勤障碍:一项横断面研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Oct 21;19(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1203-3.
7
The impact of fixed-dose combination versus free-equivalent combination therapies on adherence for hypertension: a meta-analysis.固定剂量复方制剂与自由等效复方制剂治疗高血压对依从性的影响:一项荟萃分析。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 May;20(5):902-907. doi: 10.1111/jch.13272. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
8
Single-Pill Triple Fixed Dose Combination Therapy with Single Component Drug Monitoring in Treatment-Resistant Hypertension: A Pilot Study.单片三固定剂量复方治疗药物监测在难治性高血压中的应用:一项初步研究。
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2018 Jan 26;16(2):197-203. doi: 10.2174/1570161115666170821155555.
9
Cross-sectional survey evaluating blood pressure control ACHIEVEment in hypertensive patients treated with multiple anti-hypertensive agents in Belgium and Luxembourg.横断面调查评估在比利时和卢森堡接受多种抗高血压药物治疗的高血压患者的血压控制达标情况。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 1;13(11):e0206510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206510. eCollection 2018.
10
Fixed-Dose Combination Medications for Treating Hypertension: A Review of Effectiveness, Safety, and Challenges.固定剂量复方药物治疗高血压:有效性、安全性和挑战的综述。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2020 Oct 14;22(11):95. doi: 10.1007/s11906-020-01109-2.

引用本文的文献

1
WHF Roadmap on Single Pill Combination Therapies.世界心力衰竭学会单一片剂联合疗法路线图
Glob Heart. 2025 Aug 29;20(1):73. doi: 10.5334/gh.1457. eCollection 2025.
2
Forgetfulness to Take Antihypertensive Medications and Poor Blood Pressure Control in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension in Vietnam.越南2型糖尿病合并高血压老年患者忘记服用抗高血压药物与血压控制不佳的情况
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2025 Aug;27(8):e70105. doi: 10.1111/jch.70105.
3
Candidate Interventions for Integrating Hypertension and Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Care in Primary Health Settings: HEARTS 2.0 Phase 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Therapeutic Inertia With Initial Low-Dose Quadruple Combination Therapy for Hypertension: Results From the QUARTET Trial.初始低剂量四联疗法治疗高血压的治疗惰性:QUARTET 试验结果。
Hypertension. 2024 May;81(5):1087-1094. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.22284. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
2
Characteristics, management, and outcomes in women and men with congestive heart failure in 40 countries at different economic levels: an analysis from the Global Congestive Heart Failure (G-CHF) registry.在全球充血性心力衰竭(G-CHF)注册中心的分析中,来自 40 个不同经济水平国家的充血性心力衰竭女性和男性患者的特征、管理和结局。
Lancet Glob Health. 2024 Mar;12(3):e396-e405. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00557-0. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
3
在基层医疗卫生机构整合高血压与心血管-肾脏-代谢护理的候选干预措施:HEARTS 2.0 第一阶段
Glob Heart. 2025 May 27;20(1):45. doi: 10.5334/gh.1428. eCollection 2025.
Testing interventions to reduce clinical inertia in the treatment of hypertension: rationale and design of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.
测试干预措施以减少高血压治疗中的临床惰性:一项实用随机对照试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2024 Feb;268:18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.11.005. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
4
The HEARTS partner forum-supporting implementation of HEARTS to treat and control hypertension.HEARTS 伙伴论坛——支持 HEARTS 以治疗和控制高血压。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 24;11:1146441. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1146441. eCollection 2023.
5
Cost-effectiveness of ultra-low-dose quadruple combination therapy for high blood pressure.超低价四联疗法治疗高血压的成本效益。
Heart. 2023 Oct 26;109(22):1698-1705. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-322300.
6
2023 ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension: Endorsed by the International Society of Hypertension (ISH) and the European Renal Association (ERA).2023ESH 动脉高血压管理指南 欧洲高血压学会动脉高血压管理工作组:得到国际高血压学会 (ISH) 和欧洲肾脏协会 (ERA) 的认可。
J Hypertens. 2023 Dec 1;41(12):1874-2071. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003480. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
7
The Potential for a Chat-Based Artificial Intelligence Model to Facilitate Educational Messaging on Hypertension.基于聊天的人工智能模型促进高血压教育信息传播的潜力。
Hypertension. 2023 Aug;80(8):e128-e130. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.21395. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
8
Cost-Related Medication Nonadherence and Desire for Medication Cost Information Among Adults Aged 65 Years and Older in the US in 2022.2022 年美国 65 岁及以上成年人与药物费用相关的用药不依从性和对药物费用信息的需求。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2314211. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.14211.
9
Hypertension therapy using fixed-dose polypills that contain at least three medications.使用包含至少三种药物的固定剂量复方制剂进行高血压治疗。
Heart. 2023 Aug 11;109(17):1273-1280. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321496.
10
Disparities in Prevalence and Barriers to Hypertension Control: A Systematic Review.高血压控制的患病率和障碍差异:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 6;19(21):14571. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114571.