Suppr超能文献

传统CT与锥形束计算机断层扫描在肺活检中的应用:诊断性能、风险以及明胶海绵颗粒混悬液经皮穿刺道栓塞的优势

Conventional versus cone-beam computed tomography in lung biopsy: diagnostic performance, risks, and the advantages of tract embolization with gelfoam particle suspension.

作者信息

Zou Xugong, Cui Ning, Ma Qiang, Lin Zhipeng, Zhang Jian, Li Xiaoqun

机构信息

Department of Interventional Medicine, Zhongshan People's Hospital, Zhongshan, China.

Medical Imaging Center, Taihe Hospital, Shiyan, China.

出版信息

Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Sep 1;14(9):6479-6492. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-342. Epub 2024 Aug 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the widespread adoption of computed tomography (CT) technology, the number of detected pulmonary nodules has gradually increased. CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy has become the primary method for qualitative diagnosis of pulmonary nodules. Benefiting from its three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction capability, cone-beam CT (CBCT) technology has also been widely adopted. Nevertheless, pneumothorax remains the most common complication of these diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of conventional CT (CCT)- and CBCT-guided coaxial core needle biopsy (CCNB) and the effectiveness of gelfoam particle suspension in reducing complications through tract embolization.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 320 patients who had undergone CCNB for nodules ≤3 cm from January 2020 to June 2022 at Zhongshan People's Hospital, comprising 325 biopsies (145 CCT-guided and 180 CBCT-guided). Gelfoam tract embolization was specifically used in biopsies of patients identified with a high risk of complications. Comparative statistics involved diagnostic outcomes (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy), procedural lengths, complication occurrences, and radiation doses.

RESULTS

Diagnostically, both CCT (sensitivity 93.3%, specificity 100%, accuracy 94.1%) and CBCT (sensitivity 92.8%, specificity 100%, accuracy 93.8%) offered a similarly high performance. The CCT technique was preferable in terms of shorter median operational times (19 24 minutes; P<0.001) and greater radiation exposure (13.9 10.1 mSv; P<0.001). The complication rates of CBCT and CCT, such as those of pneumothorax (18.9% 20.7%; P=0.69) and hemorrhage (23.9% 18.6%; P=0.25), were comparable. Of note, the comparison of biopsies with and without gelfoam embolization revealed a marked reduction in postoperative pneumothorax incidence (1.24% 7.9%; P=0.004) and the requirement for drainage (0% 4.27%; P=0.02), indicating the effectiveness of this procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

CCT- and CBCT-guided lung biopsies demonstrate equivalent diagnostic capacities, with CCT providing shorter median operational times. Importantly, gelfoam embolization substantially diminishes the risk of postoperative pneumothorax, underscoring its value in high-risk patients.

摘要

背景

随着计算机断层扫描(CT)技术的广泛应用,检出的肺结节数量逐渐增加。CT引导下经皮穿刺针吸活检已成为肺结节定性诊断的主要方法。得益于其三维(3D)重建能力,锥形束CT(CBCT)技术也已被广泛采用。然而,气胸仍然是这些诊断和治疗程序最常见的并发症。本研究评估了传统CT(CCT)引导和CBCT引导同轴芯针活检(CCNB)的诊断准确性,以及明胶海绵颗粒混悬液通过穿刺道栓塞减少并发症的有效性。

方法

对2020年1月至2022年6月在中山市人民医院对直径≤3 cm的结节进行CCNB的320例患者进行回顾性分析,共进行了325次活检(145次CCT引导和180次CBCT引导)。明胶海绵穿刺道栓塞专门用于确定有高并发症风险患者的活检。比较统计包括诊断结果(敏感性、特异性、准确性)、操作时间、并发症发生率和辐射剂量。

结果

在诊断方面,CCT(敏感性93.3%,特异性100%,准确性94.1%)和CBCT(敏感性92.8%,特异性100%,准确性93.8%)均表现出同样高的性能。CCT技术在中位操作时间较短(19对24分钟;P<0.001)和辐射暴露量较大(13.9对10.1 mSv;P<0.001)方面更具优势。CBCT和CCT的并发症发生率,如气胸(18.9%对20.7%;P=0.69)和出血(23.9%对18.6%;P=0.25)相当。值得注意的是,对有和没有明胶海绵栓塞的活检进行比较发现,术后气胸发生率(1.24%对7.9%;P=0.004)和引流需求(0%对4.27%;P=0.02)显著降低,表明该操作有效。

结论

CCT引导和CBCT引导的肺活检显示出同等的诊断能力,CCT的中位操作时间更短。重要的是,明胶海绵栓塞显著降低了术后气胸的风险,突出了其在高危患者中的价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b67/11400691/629009973771/qims-14-09-6479-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验