Ahmed Muhammad Adeel
Muhammad Adeel Ahmed Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa, P.O. Box 31982, Saudi Arabia.
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Sep;40(8):1770-1775. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.8.9491.
To evaluate the shade selection accuracy of male dental students according to the three dimensions of color: value, hue, and chroma, using visual and instrumental shade selection methods under different lighting conditions.
This comparative cross-sectional study was instigated amongst 70 male 4, 5, and 6 years BDS students of the Dental Clinics Complex at King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia for a duration of two months. First, the principal investigator determined the shade of tooth 11 and 46 on patient utilizing the spectrophotometer after calibration. In the next step, students were asked to select the shade of same tooth 11 and 46 using VITA 3D-Master shade guide under clinic lightening condition and corrected light. The characteristics of the color such as hue, chroma and value were recorded. The Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to find the significant difference in shade selection between visual and instrumental methods with respect to academic years.
The mean of the value of instrumental shade selection of tooth # 46 was slightly higher among 4 year students (4.41±0.73), than that of 5 year (3.72±1.02), and 6 year students (3.83±0.83), with a statistically significant difference among them (p= 0.024), indicating 6 year students selected darker shades. Additionally, a statistically significant relationship was noticed among 4, 5, and 6 year students with respect to the means of the chroma of 2.18 ±1.29, 2.92±1.11, and 3.13±1.10, respectively (= 0.025).
The selection of posterior teeth shades was notably influenced by academic years, employing both instrumental and visual methods, while considering color parameters.
在不同光照条件下,使用视觉和仪器比色法,根据颜色的三个维度:明度、色调和彩度,评估男性牙科学生的比色准确性。
这项比较性横断面研究在沙特阿拉伯费萨尔国王大学牙科综合诊所的70名4、5、6年级男性口腔医学专业学生中进行,为期两个月。首先,主要研究者在校准后使用分光光度计确定患者11号和46号牙的颜色。下一步,要求学生在临床照明条件和校正光下,使用VITA 3D-Master比色板选择相同的11号和46号牙的颜色。记录颜色的特征,如色调、彩度和明度。应用Kruskal-Wallis检验来找出视觉和仪器方法在不同学年的比色选择上的显著差异。
4年级学生(4.41±0.73)对46号牙的仪器比色明度平均值略高于5年级(3.72±1.02)和6年级学生(3.83±0.83),三者之间存在统计学显著差异(p = 0.024),表明6年级学生选择的颜色较深。此外,4、5、6年级学生的彩度平均值分别为2.18±1.29、2.92±1.11和3.13±1.10,存在统计学显著关系(p = 0.025)。
在考虑颜色参数时,使用仪器和视觉方法,后牙颜色的选择受学年影响显著。