Gao Tianci, Dang Wenjun, Jiang Zhimei, Jiang Yuwei
College of Clinical Medicine, Jiamusi University, Hei longJiang Province, China.
Jiamusi College, HeiLongJiang University of Chinese Medicine, Hei longJiang Province, China.
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 22;10(17):e36572. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36572. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
This study aims to address the key question of the causal relationship between serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (vitamin D) and autism spectrum disorders (ASD).
Publicly available Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) datasets were used to conduct the bidirectional Two-sample MR analyses using methods including inverse-variance weighted (IVW), weighted median, MR-Egger regression, simple mode, MR-PRESSO test, Steiger filtering, and weighted mode, followed by BWMR for validation.
The MR analysis indicated that there was no causal relationship between Vitamin D as the exposure and ASD as the outcome in the positive direction of the MR analysis (IVW: OR = 0.984, 95 % CI: 0.821-1.18, = 0.866). The subsequent BWMR validation stage yielded consistent results (OR = 0.984, 95 % CI 0.829-1.20, = 0.994). Notably, in the reverse MR analysis with ASD as the exposure and Vitamin D as the outcome, the results suggested that the occurrence of ASD could lead to decreased Vitamin D levels (IVW: OR = 0.976, 95 % CI: 0.961-0.990, = 0.000855), with BWMR findings in the validation stage confirming the discovery phase (OR = 0.975, 95 % CI: 0.958-0.991, = 0.00297). For the positive MR analysis, no pleiotropy was detected in the instrumental variables. Similarly, no pleiotropy or heterogeneity was detected in the instrumental variables for the reverse MR analysis. Sensitivity analysis using the leave-one-out approach for both positive and reverse instrumental variables suggested that the MR analysis results were robust.
Through the discovery and validation analysis process, we can confidently assert that there is no causative link between Vitamin D and ASD, and that supplementing Vitamin D is not expected to provide effective improvement for patients with ASD. Our study significantly advances a new perspective in ASD research and has a positive impact on medication guidance for patients with ASD.
本研究旨在解决血清25-羟基维生素D(维生素D)水平与自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)之间因果关系的关键问题。
利用公开可用的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)数据集,采用逆方差加权(IVW)、加权中位数、MR-Egger回归、简单模式、MR-PRESSO检验、Steiger过滤和加权模式等方法进行双向双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)分析,随后进行BWMR验证。
MR分析表明,在MR分析的正向方向上,作为暴露因素的维生素D与作为结果的ASD之间不存在因果关系(IVW:优势比[OR]=0.984,95%置信区间[CI]:0.821-1.18,P=0.866)。随后的BWMR验证阶段得出了一致的结果(OR=0.984,95%CI 0.829-1.20,P=0.994)。值得注意的是,在以ASD为暴露因素、维生素D为结果的反向MR分析中,结果表明ASD的发生可能导致维生素D水平降低(IVW:OR=0.976,95%CI:0.961-0.990,P=0.000855),验证阶段的BWMR结果证实了发现阶段的结果(OR=0.975,95%CI:0.958-0.991,P=0.00297)。对于正向MR分析,在工具变量中未检测到多效性。同样,在反向MR分析的工具变量中也未检测到多效性或异质性。使用留一法对正向和反向工具变量进行敏感性分析表明,MR分析结果具有稳健性。
通过发现和验证分析过程,我们可以有信心地断言,维生素D与ASD之间不存在因果联系,补充维生素D预计不会为ASD患者带来有效改善。我们的研究显著推进了ASD研究的新视角,并对ASD患者的用药指导产生了积极影响。