• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环境、社会和治理(ESG)绩效作为评估政府补贴对中国投资不足影响的调节因素。

Environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance as a moderator in assessing the impact of government subsidies on underinvestment in China.

作者信息

Wang Xiaoqian, Phua Lian Kee, Wang Chu

机构信息

Economic Management and Public Affairs School, Chongqing Jianzhu College, 400072, Chongqing, China.

School of Management, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Gelugor, Penang, Malaysia.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Aug 23;10(17):e36798. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36798. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36798
PMID:39281536
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11402445/
Abstract

In recent years, underinvestment has become common among subsidised enterprises in China. Stakeholder theory asserts that environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance forces enterprises to prioritise stakeholder needs by incorporating ESG principles into business operations, which in turn influences business investment decision-making. This study examines the impact of government subsidies on firm underinvestment and whether ESG performance plays a moderating role in this direct relationship. A dataset of 17,780 firm-year observations of A-share public firms in China for the period 2011-2021 was employed, and the data were analysed using the ordinary least squares regression model, fixed-effects regression model, propensity score matching difference-in-difference model, and instrumental variable approach. These results indicate that government subsidies mitigate firm underinvestment and tend to reduce underinvestment in firms with higher ESG performance. Moreover, the findings indicate that the performance in ESG factors influences the effect of government subsidies on the lack of investment in state-owned enterprises (SOEs), as opposed to non-SOEs. This effect is more noticeable in heavily polluting industries compared to non-heavily polluting industries. These findings imply that the government should promote the ESG performance of subsidised firms to enhance their overall corporate investment efficiency.

摘要

近年来,投资不足在中国受补贴企业中已变得普遍。利益相关者理论认为,环境、社会和治理(ESG)绩效促使企业通过将ESG原则纳入商业运营来优先考虑利益相关者的需求,这反过来又会影响企业的投资决策。本研究考察了政府补贴对企业投资不足的影响,以及ESG绩效在这种直接关系中是否起到调节作用。我们使用了2011年至2021年期间中国A股上市公司17780个公司年度观测值的数据集,并采用普通最小二乘法回归模型、固定效应回归模型、倾向得分匹配法双重差分模型和工具变量法对数据进行了分析。这些结果表明,政府补贴减轻了企业的投资不足,并倾向于减少ESG绩效较高企业的投资不足。此外,研究结果表明,ESG因素的绩效会影响政府补贴对国有企业(而非非国有企业)投资不足的影响。与非重污染行业相比,这种影响在重污染行业更为明显。这些发现意味着政府应推动受补贴企业的ESG绩效,以提高其整体企业投资效率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea1a/11402445/38f6dc20cde5/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea1a/11402445/a1e5f8a4a466/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea1a/11402445/38f6dc20cde5/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea1a/11402445/a1e5f8a4a466/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea1a/11402445/38f6dc20cde5/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance as a moderator in assessing the impact of government subsidies on underinvestment in China.环境、社会和治理(ESG)绩效作为评估政府补贴对中国投资不足影响的调节因素。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 23;10(17):e36798. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36798. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
2
Can companies get more government subsidies through improving their ESG performance? Empirical evidence from China.企业能否通过提高 ESG 绩效获得更多政府补贴?来自中国的经验证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 3;18(10):e0292355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292355. eCollection 2023.
3
The impact of executives' green experience on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance: Evidence from China.高管绿色经验对环境、社会和治理(ESG)绩效的影响:来自中国的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Aug;366:121819. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121819. Epub 2024 Jul 13.
4
The impact of environmental tax laws on heavy-polluting enterprise ESG performance: A stakeholder behavior perspective.环境税收法规对重污染企业 ESG 绩效的影响:利益相关者行为视角。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Oct 15;344:118578. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118578. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
5
ESG performance, capital financing decisions, and audit quality: empirical evidence from Chinese state-owned enterprises.ESG 绩效、资本融资决策和审计质量:来自中国国有企业的经验证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(15):44086-44099. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25345-6. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
6
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and financial outcomes: Analyzing the impact of ESG on financial performance.环境、社会和治理(ESG)绩效与财务成果:分析ESG对财务绩效的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Nov 1;345:118829. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118829. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
7
Empirical Study on the Impact of Government Environmental Subsidies on Environmental Performance of Heavily Polluting Enterprises Based on the Regulating Effect of Internal Control.基于内部控制调节效应的政府环境补贴对重污染企业环境绩效的实证研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 21;20(1):98. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010098.
8
ESG performance, auditing quality, and investment efficiency: Empirical evidence from China.企业社会责任表现、审计质量与投资效率:来自中国的实证证据
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 12;13:948674. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.948674. eCollection 2022.
9
Green Financial Reform and Corporate ESG Performance in China: Empirical Evidence from the Green Financial Reform and Innovation Pilot Zone.中国绿色金融改革与企业 ESG 绩效:来自绿色金融改革创新试验区的经验证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 14;19(22):14981. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214981.
10
How does digital transformation affect the ESG performance of Chinese manufacturing state-owned enterprises?-Based on the mediating mechanism of dynamic capabilities and the moderating mechanism of the institutional environment.数字转型如何影响中国制造业国有企业的 ESG 绩效?——基于动态能力的中介机制和制度环境的调节机制。
PLoS One. 2024 May 14;19(5):e0301864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301864. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 impact on firm investment-Evidence from Chinese publicly listed firms.新冠疫情对企业投资的影响——来自中国上市公司的证据
J Asian Econ. 2021 Aug;75:101320. doi: 10.1016/j.asieco.2021.101320. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
2
Analysis of the influence of enterprise managers' overconfidence on the overinvestment behavior of listed companies under the media reports.媒体报道下企业管理者过度自信对上市公司过度投资行为的影响分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 18;13:1018189. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1018189. eCollection 2022.
3
ESG performance, auditing quality, and investment efficiency: Empirical evidence from China.
企业社会责任表现、审计质量与投资效率:来自中国的实证证据
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 12;13:948674. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.948674. eCollection 2022.
4
Financial constraints, government subsidies, and corporate innovation.财政约束、政府补贴与企业创新。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 10;16(11):e0259642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259642. eCollection 2021.
5
Can direct environmental regulation promote green technology innovation in heavily polluting industries? Evidence from Chinese listed companies.直接环境规制能否促进重污染产业的绿色技术创新?来自中国上市公司的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Dec 1;746:140810. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140810. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
6
A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis.Meta 分析中固定效应模型和随机效应模型的基本介绍。
Res Synth Methods. 2010 Apr;1(2):97-111. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.12. Epub 2010 Nov 21.