Barrios Benjamin, Minakata Daisuke
Department of Civil, Environmental and Geospatial Engineering, Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, Michigan 49931, United States.
ACS Omega. 2024 Aug 27;9(36):37973-37980. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c04759. eCollection 2024 Sep 10.
In oxygenated aquatic environments, the predominant scavenging of the triplet excited state of chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM*) involves dissolved ground-state oxygen, diverting attention away from the scavenging mechanisms of CDOM* mediated through specific organic compounds. Previous studies demonstrated that model CDOM* exhibited quantum yields (i.e., 1-56%) in the formation of radical ions, resulting from the competition between physical and chemical quenching through a common exciplex intermediate. Physical quenching was rationalized through the reverse intersystem crossing of the exciplex, followed by back electron transfer, yielding ground-state reactants. Despite this, direct experimental evidence for exciplex involvement has been elusive, owing to detection challenges. Herein, employing density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT specifically for excited state surrogate CDOM and organic scavengers, we unveil, for the first time, the underlying mechanisms responsible for the quenching of Rose Bengal through oxidative and reductive scavengers. Our computational findings provide evidence for the involvement of exciplexes during the quenching process of the excited triplet state of Rose Bengal, highlighting the impact of electronic coupling between Rose Bengal and quenchers on the quantum yield for radical ion formation.
在充氧的水生环境中,发色溶解有机物三线态激发态(CDOM*)的主要清除过程涉及溶解的基态氧,这使得人们的注意力从通过特定有机化合物介导的CDOM清除机制上转移开来。先前的研究表明,模型CDOM在自由基离子形成过程中表现出量子产率(即1 - 56%),这是由通过常见激基复合物中间体的物理猝灭和化学猝灭之间的竞争导致的。物理猝灭通过激基复合物的反向系间窜越,随后进行反向电子转移来解释,从而产生基态反应物。尽管如此,由于检测方面的挑战,激基复合物参与其中的直接实验证据一直难以获得。在此,我们采用密度泛函理论(DFT)和专门针对激发态替代CDOM及有机清除剂的含时DFT,首次揭示了通过氧化和还原清除剂淬灭孟加拉玫瑰红的潜在机制。我们的计算结果为激基复合物在孟加拉玫瑰红激发三线态淬灭过程中的参与提供了证据,突出了孟加拉玫瑰红与淬灭剂之间的电子耦合对自由基离子形成量子产率的影响