Yassin Ahmed M, Kanapathy Muholan, Khater Amr M E, El-Sabbagh Ahmed Hassan, Shouman Omar, Nikkhah Dariush, Mosahebi Afshin
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Egypt.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
JPRAS Open. 2023 Aug 21;38:98-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2023.08.004. eCollection 2023 Dec.
In this study, we evaluate the versatility of smartphone thermal imaging technology as a valuable intraoperative modality in different stages of perforator flap surgery aiming to minimize the complications and achieve the best postoperative outcome.
Thermography was performed in 20 perforator flaps in 20 patients at different surgical stages in three different ways to identify the most dominant perforator: first, by measuring the surface temperature of the skin; second, by using the dynamic infrared thermography technique; and third, by assessing the perfusion pattern when the flap was supplied by each perforator separately. Thermography was used to help in discarding the least perfused area of the flap. After microvascular anastomosis, the flap reheating pattern was evaluated.
Seventeen free and three pedicled perforator flaps were included. Intraoperatively, each of the selected perforators had a corresponding hotspot. The perforator with the hottest hotpot, best rewarming, and provision of best flap perfusion on thermography was found clinically dominant. After microvascular anastomosis in free flaps, rapid rewarming was recorded in 15 cases. In two deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps, no rapid rewarming was observed. The pedicle was kinked in one case and there was a venous insufficiency in another case that required a cephalic turndown. All flaps showed good perfusion on thermography after inset.
Smartphone thermography has proven to be a valuable, cheap, rapidly employed, and objective tool not only for the design of perforator flaps, but also for the decision making intraoperatively to achieve the best surgical outcome.
在本研究中,我们评估了智能手机热成像技术作为一种有价值的术中方式在穿支皮瓣手术不同阶段的通用性,旨在将并发症降至最低并实现最佳术后效果。
对20例患者的20个穿支皮瓣在不同手术阶段以三种不同方式进行热成像检查,以确定最主要的穿支:第一,通过测量皮肤表面温度;第二,使用动态红外热成像技术;第三,通过分别评估每个穿支供血时皮瓣的灌注模式。热成像用于帮助排除皮瓣灌注最差的区域。微血管吻合后,评估皮瓣再热模式。
纳入17个游离穿支皮瓣和3个带蒂穿支皮瓣。术中,每个选定的穿支都有一个相应的热点。在热成像上,热点温度最高、再热最佳且皮瓣灌注最佳的穿支在临床上占主导地位。游离皮瓣微血管吻合后,15例记录到快速再热。在2例腹壁下深穿支皮瓣中,未观察到快速再热。1例出现蒂部扭转,另1例出现静脉功能不全,需要行头静脉转位。所有皮瓣植入后在热成像上均显示良好的灌注。
智能手机热成像已被证明是一种有价值、廉价、使用迅速且客观的工具,不仅可用于穿支皮瓣的设计,还可用于术中决策以实现最佳手术效果。